[200WILLIAM-EC SP67851] Fwd: RE: Vote for dummy camera replaced
matt at perkins.id.au
matt at perkins.id.au
Fri Nov 24 17:27:24 AEDT 2023
Matt
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: matt at perkins.id.au
Date: 24 Nov 2023 at 5:26 PM +1100
To: 'Kylie Curtis' <kyliempearce at icloud.com>, John Burney <j.burney at auscorpimage.com.au>
Cc: 'Paul Mooney' <paulmooney at manxpm.com.au>, 'Matthew Guy' <matthew_guy at hotmail.com>, 'MQ. Craig Laforest' <cscl at optusnet.com.au>
Subject: RE: Vote for dummy camera replaced
> Hi All,
> I have sent the following to Arnold.
>
> ---
> Hi Arnold,
> Happy Friday. Over the last few weeks at 200 William, there have been a number of security incidents in the building. We had a domestic occurrence as well as some malicious damage to common property, but perhaps of most concern was a mass break-in to 5 apartments with multiple items stolen. When the detectives were on site, they noted that a number of the cameras in the building were dummy cameras and did not record any useful video.
>
> The Residential SC requested a quote to replace the dummy cameras with working ones and install associated cable and equipment. We received two quotes, with the best being from the incumbent security provider (attached). We asked for all the dummies to be replaced with operational cameras, including the lifts. However, after investigating the cost of lift cabling, we found that those cameras were not practically fundable given the benefit. The Residential OC has since voted to approve the upgrade, excluding the lift cameras. However, as building security is a BMC item, I am seeking your permission to progress the install.
>
> I think there is value in the upgrade for the commercial strata as well. The glass awning at the front of Pack and Send has been smashed by trucks a number of times, and typically they drive off leaving our insurance to pay the bill. One of the dummy upgrades should capture any damage to the building in that area.
>
> The quote is $5860 with the commercial's share being $1172.
>
> Matt
> On 24 Nov 2023 at 5:19 PM +1100, John Burney <j.burney at auscorpimage.com.au>, wrote:
> > I agree Kylie - cheers john
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kylie Curtis <kyliempearce at icloud.com>
> > Sent: Friday, 24 November 2023 4:58 PM
> > To: Matt Perkins <matt at perkins.id.au>
> > Cc: Paul Mooney <paulmooney at manxpm.com.au>; Matthew Guy
> > <matthew_guy at hotmail.com>; MQ. Craig Laforest <cscl at optusnet.com.au>; John
> > Burney <j.burney at auscorpimage.com.au>
> > Subject: Vote for dummy camera replaced
> >
> > Hi Matt
> >
> > I think I missed one of your emails but I want to vote yes for the dummy
> > cameras to be replaced.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Warm Regards,
> > Kylie
> > Sent from my iPhone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.perkins.id.au/pipermail/ec/attachments/20231124/d6c34c78/attachment.htm>
More information about the ec
mailing list