[200WILLIAM-EC SP67851] SP67851 informal meeting proposal.

[Matthew Perkins - Private]

Hi All,

Outside lights:  I have not had a chance to look at the outside lights 
as yet. I will have a look at the tomorrow. I broke my glasses and have 
been in a sorry state over the weekend not being able to read anything.

Gigacom: As per my previous happy to go with the consensus. Their 
paperwork does not serve land access so they are not forcing us to do 
anything at this point.  Why not just ignore it for now. Unless someone 
wants it.

Financials: I think they looked like a standard P&: type sheet. It made 
sense to me but as it needs to be read in conjunction with the P&L from 
the BMC I dont have that So I cant tell the true state of the accounts. 
What Matt Sent looks bad. (On it's own)

Flowers:  We get billed monthly so in my mind it's like  a lot of little 
expenses. Under the $2k limit so in my mind i think the EC would be ok 
to authorize it at an EC meeting or a schedule 2 meeting. My original 
feelings have not changed in that I doubt STM would pay the bills so we 
might need to wait for Ascend to get control of the bank accounts before 
we tell them to go ahead.   As for  what we do in the meantime the 
building has not had flowers for 16 or so years. I doubt another month 
will kill anyone.  Once Ascend have the books we can have an EC meeting. 
Sarah can do the agenda and we can approve it. I think we all agree and 
are grateful for Craigs help in finding a forest. I think it works out 
as less then $100 P/A for most apartments.

Matt.



On 13/3/2023 9:55 am, cscl at optusnet.com.au wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Thanks Paul.
>
> I’m happy to meet for an informal discussion on these topics.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Craig
>
> *From:*Paul Mooney <paulmooney at manxpm.com.au>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 13, 2023 9:01 AM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com
> *Subject:* SP67851 informal meeting proposal.
>
> Good morning,
>
> I wondered if it might be a good time to have an informal meeting of 
> the committee members to discuss a few items that will crop up shortly.
>
> What do we think of the pros and cons of the GiggaComm Pty Ltd 
> proposal to add installations to our common area on the roof?
>
> Can we clarify what we know of our financials at this time because I 
> don’t follow the $96 grand reference in Matt P earlier email. I did 
> ask Craig and he, like me, would like clarification.
>
> External lighting needs a chat to see who favours what approach to 
> replacement.
>
> I wasn’t being churlish when I removed the vase and flowers at the 
> weekend, but they needed changing and I had spent $50 on each of the 
> previous weekends and decided not to proceed. Which brings me to 
> question the $2000 limit the committee can spend. Is this in a year, 
> per specific item or what because it seems we could contribute to 
> flowers until the $2000 is exhausted or treat each purchase as a 
> separate costing.  Not a big issue with me, just a thought that needs 
> clarification.
>
> Other concerns could be covered at the same time without the need for 
> official agenda, just a memorandum of items. It’s perfectly normal and 
> in order for committee members to meet and chat from time to time.
>
> Am happy to host if no one else will , or local coffee shop is an option.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Paul
>
>
-- 
** DO NOT SEND PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL VIA EMAIL

Matt Perkins
0403571333
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.perkins.id.au/pipermail/ec/attachments/20230313/b69bcf13/attachment.htm>