[200William-EC] A suggestion......

[Rob Willett]

Hi Folks

I was thinking just the EC members who can attend, Maxine attends maybe twice a year as already planned, what do you think?

ROB




>________________________________
> From: "barnet at kitays.com" <barnet at kitays.com>
>To: ec at 200william.com 
>Sent: Friday, June 8, 2012 10:09 AM
>Subject: Re: [200William-EC] A suggestion......
> 
>I Agree,
>
>The emails have become overwhelming and over-discussed.
>
>Following on from the discussion at the AGM on the requirement for STRATA
>TITLE 
>to attend all these bi-monthly meetings, I personally don't think this is 
>necessary due to the additional cost for attendance at each meeting and
>that it 
>is likely we will be discussing management issues and not strata related
>issues. 
>
>Can this please be assessed.
>
>Barney
>0400 200 446
>
>========================================================================
>
>Original Message:
>-----------------
>From: Rob Willett rob at oneforall.com.au
>Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:24:43 +1000
>To: ec at 200william.com
>Subject: [200William-EC] A suggestion......
>
>
>Hi Folks:
>
>As we can all see, over the past week there have been numerous emails  
>going back and forth on matters pertaining to the building. The  
>pleasing thing about it all is the interest everyone is taking in the  
>maintenance of the building which in the long-run is good for all of  
>us. And especially pleasing to see the new guys in Barney, Rowan, Matt  
>getting involved.
>
>However, in my opinion, doing everything by email and jobs randomly is  
>very inefficient. And probably making it a bit more expensive. And  
>doesn't help George to keep on top of it all.
>
>So my suggestion.
>
>Why don't we schedule in an EC meeting every 2 months instead of the 3  
>times we have now. What we could do is keep a list of the matters that  
>need attending too ( like an agenda ) and then come together and  
>discuss face to face. As I said before, it's great every one is  
>involved, it's great every one has an opinion. I think it would be  
>good for all of us to discuss. I would be happy to be the person that  
>has matters and suggestions sent to and compile the agenda for each  
>meeting. The meeting would not have to take more than an hour each  
>time, if that. And of course there would be times when all 9 of us  
>can't get together. That's to be expected. And that's OK. But we can  
>get things done probably a lot quicker and much more efficiently. But  
>it would stop the endless emails ( and avoid emails being misconstrued  
>by their tone ). There would be times when emergency matters have to  
>be dealt with right away and by having a bi monthly meeting would  
>actually facilitate better.
>
>What does everyone think? YES or NO.
>
>If you agree, I will set the dates, get everyone's agreement and  
>voila! I would even send out a note before 1 week before each meeting  
>as a reminder and ask for any matters to go on agenda
>
>Regards
>
>ROB WILLETT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
>hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>EC mailing list
>EC at 200william.com
>http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20120608/87aec5de/attachment.html