[200William-EC] A suggestion......

[Matt Perkins]

Im a bit of an email fan.But happy to have more meetings if that's 
what's needed.
So a YES vote. There is no need for strata rep to come this is 
unnecessary expenditure.

Im happy to do the agenda etc as secretary but if you want to do that 
Rob. Your welcome.

Matt.



On 8/06/12 11:21 AM, Rowan Holloway wrote:
> Yes I agree with that Rob.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On Behalf
> Of barnet at kitays.com
> Sent: Friday, 8 June 2012 10:10 AM
> To: ec at 200william.com
> Subject: Re: [200William-EC] A suggestion......
>
> I Agree,
>
> The emails have become overwhelming and over-discussed.
>
> Following on from the discussion at the AGM on the requirement for STRATA
> TITLE to attend all these bi-monthly meetings, I personally don't think this
> is necessary due to the additional cost for attendance at each meeting and
> that it is likely we will be discussing management issues and not strata
> related issues.
>
> Can this please be assessed.
>
> Barney
> 0400 200 446
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Rob Willett rob at oneforall.com.au
> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:24:43 +1000
> To: ec at 200william.com
> Subject: [200William-EC] A suggestion......
>
>
> Hi Folks:
>
> As we can all see, over the past week there have been numerous emails going
> back and forth on matters pertaining to the building. The pleasing thing
> about it all is the interest everyone is taking in the maintenance of the
> building which in the long-run is good for all of us. And especially
> pleasing to see the new guys in Barney, Rowan, Matt getting involved.
>
> However, in my opinion, doing everything by email and jobs randomly is very
> inefficient. And probably making it a bit more expensive. And doesn't help
> George to keep on top of it all.
>
> So my suggestion.
>
> Why don't we schedule in an EC meeting every 2 months instead of the 3 times
> we have now. What we could do is keep a list of the matters that need
> attending too ( like an agenda ) and then come together and discuss face to
> face. As I said before, it's great every one is involved, it's great every
> one has an opinion. I think it would be good for all of us to discuss. I
> would be happy to be the person that has matters and suggestions sent to and
> compile the agenda for each meeting. The meeting would not have to take more
> than an hour each time, if that. And of course there would be times when all
> 9 of us can't get together. That's to be expected. And that's OK. But we can
> get things done probably a lot quicker and much more efficiently. But it
> would stop the endless emails ( and avoid emails being misconstrued by their
> tone ). There would be times when emergency matters have to be dealt with
> right away and by having a bi monthly meeting would actually facilitate
> better.
>
> What does everyone think? YES or NO.
>
> If you agree, I will set the dates, get everyone's agreement and voila! I
> would even send out a note before 1 week before each meeting as a reminder
> and ask for any matters to go on agenda
>
> Regards
>
> ROB WILLETT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> myhosting.com - Premium MicrosoftR WindowsR and Linux web and application
> hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec