[200William-EC] A suggestion......

[Rowan Holloway]

Yes I agree with that Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On Behalf
Of barnet at kitays.com
Sent: Friday, 8 June 2012 10:10 AM
To: ec at 200william.com
Subject: Re: [200William-EC] A suggestion......

I Agree,

The emails have become overwhelming and over-discussed.

Following on from the discussion at the AGM on the requirement for STRATA
TITLE to attend all these bi-monthly meetings, I personally don't think this
is necessary due to the additional cost for attendance at each meeting and
that it is likely we will be discussing management issues and not strata
related issues. 

Can this please be assessed.

Barney
0400 200 446

========================================================================

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Rob Willett rob at oneforall.com.au
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:24:43 +1000
To: ec at 200william.com
Subject: [200William-EC] A suggestion......


Hi Folks:

As we can all see, over the past week there have been numerous emails going
back and forth on matters pertaining to the building. The pleasing thing
about it all is the interest everyone is taking in the maintenance of the
building which in the long-run is good for all of us. And especially
pleasing to see the new guys in Barney, Rowan, Matt getting involved.

However, in my opinion, doing everything by email and jobs randomly is very
inefficient. And probably making it a bit more expensive. And doesn't help
George to keep on top of it all.

So my suggestion.

Why don't we schedule in an EC meeting every 2 months instead of the 3 times
we have now. What we could do is keep a list of the matters that need
attending too ( like an agenda ) and then come together and discuss face to
face. As I said before, it's great every one is involved, it's great every
one has an opinion. I think it would be good for all of us to discuss. I
would be happy to be the person that has matters and suggestions sent to and
compile the agenda for each meeting. The meeting would not have to take more
than an hour each time, if that. And of course there would be times when all
9 of us can't get together. That's to be expected. And that's OK. But we can
get things done probably a lot quicker and much more efficiently. But it
would stop the endless emails ( and avoid emails being misconstrued by their
tone ). There would be times when emergency matters have to be dealt with
right away and by having a bi monthly meeting would actually facilitate
better.

What does everyone think? YES or NO.

If you agree, I will set the dates, get everyone's agreement and voila! I
would even send out a note before 1 week before each meeting as a reminder
and ask for any matters to go on agenda

Regards

ROB WILLETT








--------------------------------------------------------------------
myhosting.com - Premium MicrosoftR WindowsR and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec