[200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3 Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
Matt Perkins
matt at spectrum.com.au
Mon Jul 24 11:15:17 AEST 2017
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for the follow up. I agree with the engineer that we are better
off going for 2 Layer Torch on so as to improve the life. We previously
got less then 10 years out of the Liquid for the cost It would be nice
to get a longer period.
Thanks for trying to save us some money Patrick on re-establishing the
garden. We can use every saving we can.
Matt.
On 24/7/17 10:58 am, Patrick Rush wrote:
>
> Dear Committee,
>
> Please see below the responses from the questions posed by Craig from
> the Engineers that I received on Friday 21^st July 2017 –
>
> 1. /Can we get comment from the engineer on their recommendation
> torch on vs liquid membrane? ///
>
> //
>
> /*The liquid membrane is suitable but the torch on membrane offers a
> longer lifespan.
>
> */
>
> 2. /Refer to the tenders which Patrick Rush sent to us on Dec01,
> 2016 - the differences in how much soil/plants had to be taken
> out vary significantly in size and cost. Based on what is in green
> below, all planter boxes should be emptied and new membrane put
> in. The existing planter box membrane has been proven to be
> deteriorated///
>
> ////
>
> /I have just spoken with Chris, the contractor from Preservation
> Technologies, and he has advised me that he has been told by the
> Engineer to only take out 5 metres of the plants from level 7 instead
> of the full length. He is stunned, as am I, as to why only 5 metres
> is to be taken out and a new membrane put down on this length only. I
> have stalactites hanging toward the other end of the planter box,
> nowhere near the area where plants have been taken out. Can you
> investigate and explain please asap.///
>
> ////
>
> /The planter boxes were flood tested by Cutler and Wright at the start
> of the year and found to not cause any leaks into the below units.
> Only 5m of the planters were removed to physically examine the
> condition of the waterproofing. If the waterproofing was found to be
> adequate no further work would be needed, saving the SC from these
> additional cost. However, the physical examination of the planter
> boxes showed the waterproofing has in fact deteriorated and would need
> replacement. Therefore this has been added to the meeting minutes as a
> consideration for the SC. The SC can decide if they would like to
> proceed with waterproofing the planter boxes at a variation cost to be
> provided by Prestech./////
>
> //
>
> /*Preservation Technology have provided the following:*/
>
> o */Additional cost to remove and replace on completion the
> remaining plants and soil, prepare the substrate and install a
> 2 layer bitumen torch on membrane system to terrace above unit
> 601 - $25,237 + GST./*
> o */Additional cost to remove and replace on completion the
> remaining plants and soil, prepare the substrate and install a
> 2 layer bitumen torch on membrane system to terrace above unit
> 602 - $35,356 + GST/*
>
> //
>
> 3. /What does our engineer suggest we do for 2 or 3 layer torchings?///
>
> ////
>
> //*/I suggest the two layer for cost reasons only./*
>
> I have requested an urgent quote for just removing the soil form the
> planter boxes and undertaking the waterproofing rectification as it is
> likely less expensive to have a landscaper/gardener reinstate the
> planter boxes as per the discussion on site during their meeting to
> approve Preservation Technologies tender.
>
> I will advise on the amended quotes from the above once received from
> Preservation Technologies through the Engineers.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
> Phone:(02) 9266 2600 |DirectPhone:(02) 9266 2695 |
> Email:prush at stratatitle.com.au
> <mailto:northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address:PO Box 2727, Taren
> Point, NSW 2229
>
> **
>
> BSC_STM_logo_4c cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement>cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box<http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm>cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata>pinterest.png
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata>google_plus.png
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
> **
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this email
> when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our
> website –www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
> <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/>
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on
> the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for
> any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author
> discretion is advised.
>
> *From:*Craig Laforest [mailto:cscl at optusnet.com.au]
> *Sent:* Monday, 17 July 2017 4:29 PM
> *To:* Patrick Rush <prush at stratatitle.com.au>
> *Cc:* ec at 200william.com
> *Subject:* FW: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2
> & 3 Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
> Hello Patrick,
>
> You mentioned that you would have a response to the request below by
> last Friday to send to us. Would you please advise where we stand with
> this important matter and also when the works on P4 will commence
> around my and Robin Patrick’s car and storage spaces.
>
> Thank you,
> Craig Laforest
>
> *From:*ec-bounces at 200william.com <mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com>
> [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Rush
> *Sent:* Thursday, 13 July 2017 4:54 PM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2
> & 3 Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
> Hi Craig & Matt,
>
>
> I have sent your queries to the Engineers to have a response back to
> you by tomorrow.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
> Phone:(02) 9266 2600 |DirectPhone:(02) 9266 2695 |
> Email:prush at stratatitle.com.au
> <mailto:northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address:PO Box 2727, Taren
> Point, NSW 2229
>
> **
>
> BSC_STM_logo_4c cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement>cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box<http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm>cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata>pinterest.png
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata>google_plus.png
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
> **
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this email
> when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our
> website –www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
> <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/>
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on
> the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for
> any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author
> discretion is advised.
>
> *From:*ec-bounces at 200william.com <mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com>
> [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com]
> <mailto:[mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com]> *On Behalf Of *Craig Laforest
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 July 2017 6:38 PM
> *To:* 'Matt Perkins' <matt at spectrum.com.au
> <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>>; ec at 200william.com
> <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2
> & 3 Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
> Hello Patrick and EC members,
>
> I recommend the following:
>
> 1. Refer to the tenders which Patrick Rush sent to us on Dec01, 2016
> - the differences in how much soil/plants had to be taken out vary
> significantly in size and cost. Based on what is in green below, all
> planter boxes should be emptied and new membrane put in. The existing
> planter box membrane has been proven to be deteriorated…..this was
> exactly the same situation about 5 years ago. Ridiculous that our
> engineer (after visiting my home at least 3 times) and seeing
> stalactites all the way along the edge of the overhang, didn’t state
> to each of the companies which submitted tenders that all the planter
> boxes should be emptied and new membrane installed.
>
> 2. I do not agree with Matt that all north facing balconies need to be
> repaired. We have had notice of one recently and we should treat each
> separately as each becomes critical. Are there any other balconies
> which are in a dire situation? I haven’t heard of any. Have you
> Patrick been informed of any?
>
> 3. What does our brilliant engineer suggest we do for 2 or 3 layer
> torchings (below)? I’m not an expert in this regard.
>
> Would all kind members of the EC respond asap.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Laforest
>
> I have just spoken with Chris, the contractor from Preservation
> Technologies, and he has advised me that he has been told by the
> Engineer to only take out 5 metres of the plants from level 7 instead
> of the full length. He is stunned, as am I, as to why only 5 metres
> is to be taken out and a new membrane put down on this length only. I
> have stalactites hanging toward the other end of the planter box,
> nowhere near the area where plants have been taken out. Can you
> investigate and explain please asap.
>
> The planter boxes were flood tested by Cutler and Wright at the start
> of the year and found to not cause any leaks into the below units.
> Only 5m of the planters were removed to physically examine the
> condition of the waterproofing. If the waterproofing was found to be
> adequate no further work would be needed, saving the SC from these
> additional cost. *_However, the physical examination of the planter
> boxes showed the waterproofing has in fact deteriorated and would need
> replacement_*. Therefore this has been added to the meeting minutes as
> a consideration for the SC. The SC can decide if they would like to
> proceed with waterproofing the planter boxes at a variation cost to be
> provided by Prestech.
>
> *From:*ec-bounces at 200william.com <mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com>
> [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com]
> <mailto:[mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com]> *On Behalf Of *Matt Perkins
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 July 2017 5:17 PM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2
> & 3 Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
> Hi Patrick,
> Can we get comment from the engineer on their recommendation torch on
> vs liquid membrane. Also how does this sit within the budget given
> the works on P4 and also very likely works to all the north facing
> balcony's.
>
> Can we also get approval from the rest of the group regarding the
> engineers inspection of the north facing balcony's which seem to have
> the same problem as the roof.
>
> Matt
>
> On 11/7/17 5:06 pm, Patrick Rush wrote:
>
> Dear Committee,
>
> See attached the minutes of the meetings on site by Strata
> Engineering Solutions.
>
>
> The 1^st set of minutes state that a variations was required on
> the demolition costs due to the additional work required to
> dispose of building material such as insulation, chicken wire,
> etc. As stated below and in the attached minutes this variation
> was required and the cost is highlighted below in blue as being
> $8,500.00 + GST (Variation 1).
>
>
> The 2^nd set of minutes states that an additional variation will
> be required for the membrane to be installed on the podium as it
> was originally thought the membrane installed was not a torch on
> membrane and a cheaper option could be installed.
>
>
> Please review the below information, highlighted in green and
> confirm if you would prefer to go with Variation 2 or 3 for a
> torch on membrane with the only difference being the life span of
> the membrane for an additional layer for double the price?
>
> */Variation 2 -Extra over cost to install 2 layer torch on
> membrane instead of liquid membrane would be $4,981 + GST /*
>
> *//*
>
> */Variation 3 - Extra over cost to install 3 layer torch on
> membrane instead of liquid membrane would be $8,331 + GST /*
>
> At this stage and until a decision on the above is made work at
> the property has ceased.
>
>
> Paul McKay will be attending the property in the coming days to
> provide further feedback on the planter boxes and if the
> waterproofing in these is required to be rectified.
>
>
> Please urgently advise on the above which will ultimately cause
> the attached schedule to be ameneded again?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
> Phone:(02) 9266 2600 |DirectPhone:(02) 9266 2695 |
> Email:prush at stratatitle.com.au
> <mailto:northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address:PO Box 2727,
> Taren Point, NSW 2229
>
> **
>
> BSC_STM_logo_4c cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement>cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box<http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm>cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata>pinterest.png
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata>google_plus.png
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
> **
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this
> email when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our
> website –www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
> <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/>
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all
> correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and
> emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject
> to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well
> as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within
> your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>
> *From:*Patrick Rush [mailto:prush at stratatitle.com.au]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 July 2017 12:29 PM
> *To:* Tanaz Dhondy <tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au>
> <mailto:tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au>
> *Cc:* Paul McKay <paul.mckay at costinroe.com.au>
> <mailto:paul.mckay at costinroe.com.au>; Darren Vignes
> <marquis at bfms.com.au> <mailto:marquis at bfms.com.au>
> *Subject:* SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3 Request for Approval
> & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
> *Importance:* High
>
> Hi Tanaz,
>
>
> Before I send the below and attached to the Committee, can you
> please confirm the cost of Variation 1 and what this was for?
>
> Cost for disposal of the additional building material (i.e.
> insulation, chicken wire and drainage cell) $8,500+GST
>
>
> Can you provided an updated work schedule?
>
> Prestech will update their work schedule based on the SC
> determining what work they would like us to proceed with.
>
> Can you also advise on the below comments from an Owner that
> received yesterday –
>
> /I have just spoken with Chris, the contractor from Preservation
> Technologies, and he has advised me that he has been told by the
> Engineer to only take out 5 metres of the plants from level 7
> instead of the full length. He is stunned, as am I, as to why only
> 5 metres is to be taken out and a new membrane put down on this
> length only. I have stalactites hanging toward the other end of
> the planter box, nowhere near the area where plants have been
> taken out. Can you investigate and explain please asap./
>
> The planter boxes were flood tested by Cutler and Wright at the
> start of the year and found to not cause any leaks into the below
> units. Only 5m of the planters were removed to physically examine
> the condition of the waterproofing. If the waterproofing was found
> to be adequate no further work would be needed, saving the SC from
> these additional cost. However, the physical examination of the
> planter boxes showed the waterproofing has in fact deteriorated
> and would need replacement. Therefore this has been added to the
> meeting minutes as a consideration for the SC. The SC can decide
> if they would like to proceed with waterproofing the planter boxes
> at a variation cost to be provided by Prestech.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
> Phone:(02) 9266 2600 |DirectPhone:(02) 9266 2695 |
> Email:prush at stratatitle.com.au
> <mailto:northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address:PO Box 2727,
> Taren Point, NSW 2229
>
> **
>
> BSC_STM_logo_4c cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement>cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box<http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm>cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata>pinterest.png
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata>google_plus.png
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
> **
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this
> email when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our
> website –www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
> <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/>
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all
> correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and
> emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject
> to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well
> as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within
> your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>
> *From:*Tanaz Dhondy [mailto:tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au]
> *Sent:* Friday, 7 July 2017 6:37 PM
> *To:* 'Marquis' <Marquis at bfms.com.au
> <mailto:Marquis at bfms.com.au>>; Patrick Rush
> <prush at stratatitle.com.au <mailto:prush at stratatitle.com.au>>
> *Cc:* Paul McKay <paul.mckay at costinroe.com.au
> <mailto:paul.mckay at costinroe.com.au>>; Kristine Naylor
> <knaylor at smartercommunities.com.au
> <mailto:knaylor at smartercommunities.com.au>>
> *Subject:* Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
> *CO12765.00*
>
> *200 Willliam St, Woolloomooloo*
>
> **
>
> Hi Patrick/Darren,
>
> Please see attached meeting minutes from today’s meeting.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tanaz
>
> Best Regards,
>
> *Tanaz Dhondy
> **Design Engineer *
>
> Image removed by sender.
>
>
> Costin Roe Consulting Pty Ltd
> ABN 50 003 696 446
> Level 1, 8 Windmill Street, Walsh Bay
> PO Box N419, Sydney, NSW 1220 Australia
> tel: +61 2 9251 7699 fax: +61 2 9241 3731 mobile:0474 442 667
>
> email: tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au
> <mailto:tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au>
> web: www.costinroe.com.au
>
> Postal address: PO Box N419, Sydney NSW 1220
>
> Phone: 02-9251 7699 Fax: 02-9241 3731
>
> Email: mail at costinroe.com.au <mailto:mail at costinroe.com.au>
> Email: mail at strataeng.com.au <mailto:mail at strataeng.com.au>
> Web: www.costinroe.com.au <http://www.costinroe.com.au/>
>
> *Offices in Sydney, Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Newcastle and
> Wollongong.*
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged material. Any review
>
> retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities
> other than the intended recipient is
>
> prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the
> sender and delete the material from any computer. It is the duty
> of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise
>
> test the information provided before loading it onto any computer
> system. Costin Roe Consulting Pty Ltd does not warrant that the
> information is free of a virus or any
>
> other defect or error.
>
> *From:*Tanaz Dhondy
> *Sent:* Friday, 7 July 2017 9:29 AM
> *To:* 'patrick1366 at hotmail.com <mailto:patrick1366 at hotmail.com>'
> <patrick1366 at hotmail.com <mailto:patrick1366 at hotmail.com>>;
> 'Marquis' <Marquis at bfms.com.au <mailto:Marquis at bfms.com.au>>
> *Cc:* Paul McKay <paul.mckay at costinroe.com.au
> <mailto:paul.mckay at costinroe.com.au>>
> *Subject:* FW: SP67851 Terrace Remediation - meeting minutes 28 June
>
> Hi Patrick/Darren,
>
> Can you please pass on the variation cost of applying a torch-on
> membrane to the terrace slab, as per the prices below. The amounts
> provided by Prestech is an addition to the current contract sum.
>
> V2 includes 2 layers of torch-on membrane, while V3 is 3 layers of
> torch-on membrane; with the only different being an additional
> service life.
>
> The scope has specified a liquid membrane. Given that a torch-on
> membrane was found on the slab after demolition we have decided to
> consider this option, and would also potentially have a longer
> manufacturers warrantee. If the SC could please advise if they
> would like us to proceed with this variation, and if so which
> option, or maintain the current scope with the liquid applied
> membrane?
>
> Is there any further update on whether the SC have decided to
> reinstate the insulation on the terrace slab?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tanaz
>
> Best Regards,
>
> *Tanaz Dhondy
> **Design Engineer *
>
> Image removed by sender.
>
>
> Costin Roe Consulting Pty Ltd
> ABN 50 003 696 446
> Level 1, 8 Windmill Street, Walsh Bay
> PO Box N419, Sydney, NSW 1220 Australia
> tel: +61 2 9251 7699 fax: +61 2 9241 3731 mobile:0474 442 667
>
> email: tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au
> <mailto:tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au>
> web: www.costinroe.com.au
>
> Postal address: PO Box N419, Sydney NSW 1220
>
> Phone: 02-9251 7699 Fax: 02-9241 3731
>
> Email: mail at costinroe.com.au <mailto:mail at costinroe.com.au>
> Email: mail at strataeng.com.au <mailto:mail at strataeng.com.au>
> Web: www.costinroe.com.au <http://www.costinroe.com.au/>
>
> *Offices in Sydney, Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Newcastle and
> Wollongong.*
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged material. Any review
>
> retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities
> other than the intended recipient is
>
> prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the
> sender and delete the material from any computer. It is the duty
> of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise
>
> test the information provided before loading it onto any computer
> system. Costin Roe Consulting Pty Ltd does not warrant that the
> information is free of a virus or any
>
> other defect or error.
>
> *From:*John Ligas [mailto:jl at prestech.com.au]
> *Sent:* Monday, 3 July 2017 10:29 AM
> *To:* Tanaz Dhondy <tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au
> <mailto:tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au>>
> *Subject:* RE: SP67851 Terrace Remediation - meeting minutes 28 June
>
> Hi Tanaz
>
> Please find below variation cost you requested.
>
> V2-Extra over cost to install 2 layer torch on membrane instead of
> liquid membrane would be
>
> $4,981 + GST
>
> V3- Extra over cost to install 3 layer torch on membrane instead
> of liquid membrane would be
>
> $8,331 + GST
>
> Regards,
>
> John Ligas
>
> Project Manager
>
> *new-logo*
>
> *abn *::**121 107 519 18
> * m *::**0412 787 545
> * p *:: 02 8565 7777
> * f *:: 02 8565 7755
> * e *::**jl at prestech.com.au <mailto:jl at prestech.com.au>
> * w *::**_www.prestech.com.au <http://www.preservetech.com.au/>_
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> EC mailing list
>
> EC at 200william.com <mailto:EC at 200william.com>
>
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>
> --
> /* Matt Perkins
> Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
> Office 1300 133 299matt at spectrum.com.au <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>
> Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
> Spectrum Networks is a member of the Communications Alliance & TIO
> */
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
--
/* Matt Perkins
Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
Office 1300 133 299 matt at spectrum.com.au
Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
Spectrum Networks is a member of the Communications Alliance & TIO
*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170724/17d9d1c6/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3125 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170724/17d9d1c6/attachment-0003.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4236 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170724/17d9d1c6/attachment-0005.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3977 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170724/17d9d1c6/attachment-0006.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4502 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170724/17d9d1c6/attachment-0007.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1488 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170724/17d9d1c6/attachment-0008.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1725 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170724/17d9d1c6/attachment-0009.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170724/17d9d1c6/attachment-0004.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7539 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170724/17d9d1c6/attachment-0005.jpg
More information about the EC
mailing list