[200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3 Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
Robin Patrick
robin.j.patrick at gmail.com
Wed Aug 2 09:40:44 AEST 2017
Hi Patrick & EC
Apologies but I do not understand the costs here. I may be confused with
the email trail. I know when we were talking about the podium that the 2
layer torch membrane was $4981 + GST. I don't understand how these costs
jump so much when talking about the same solution for the planter boxes.
I agree with Craig that we should look at a different solution if the
plants are a root cause of the issue we should consider an alternative e.g.
cover/fake plants etc.
Regards
Robin
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Patrick Rush <prush at stratatitle.com.au>
wrote:
> Dear Committee,
>
>
>
> Please see the amended variation if the soil and plants were to be removed
> from both planter boxes, waterproofing carried out but no soil or plants
> replaced –
>
>
>
> *Preservation Technology have provided the following:*
>
>
>
> - *Additional cost to remove and replace on completion the remaining
> plants and soil, prepare the substrate and install a 2 layer bitumen torch
> on membrane system to terrace above unit 601 - $23,317 + GST.*
> - *Additional cost to remove and replace on completion the
> remaining plants and soil, prepare the substrate and install a 2 layer
> bitumen torch on membrane system to terrace above unit 602 - $33436 + GST*
>
>
>
>
>
> Can you please advise if you are happy to approve the above variations to
> the original contract or would you prefer to have this matter added to the
> AGM Agenda for the meeting to be held Wednesday 23rd August 2017?
>
>
> Note that if the decision is held over to the AGM that no further works
> will proceed.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
>
>
> Phone: (02) 9266 2600 | Direct Phone: (02) 9266 2695 | Email:
> prush at stratatitle.com.au <northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address: PO
> Box 2727, Taren Point, NSW 2229
>
>
>
> [image: BSC_STM_logo_4c] [image:
> cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement> [image:
> cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm> [image:
> cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box]
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata> [image: pinterest.png]
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata> [image: google_plus.png]
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
>
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this email
> when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our website –
> www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the
> file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot
> that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is
> advised.
>
>
>
> *From:* Craig Laforest [mailto:cscl at optusnet.com.au]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 July 2017 10:18 PM
> *To:* Patrick Rush <prush at stratatitle.com.au>; ec at 200william.com
> *Cc:* 'Marquis' <Marquis at bfms.com.au>
> *Subject:* RE: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3
> Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
>
>
> Patrick and EC,
>
> Please see my responses below to Patrick’s email.
>
> Regards,
> Craig Laforest
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com
> <ec-bounces at 200william.com>] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Rush
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 July 2017 10:25 AM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com
> *Cc:* 'Marquis'
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3
> Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
>
>
> Hi Craig,
>
>
>
> Please see my responses below to your queries/statements which have
> previously been answered –
>
>
>
> 1. Non-evasive plants can be chosen and planted in the planter box
> that should not affect the waterproofing in the planter box. This can also
> be assisted by a gardener continually trimming the plants to ensure the
> roots do not grow further and damage the waterproofing. A
> landscaper/horticulturist will be able to assist with the finer details.
>
>
>
> Any storage area for water from rain or a sprinkler system, which the box
> area of the plants basically are, provide a definite build-up and as we’ve
> seen over time, the membrane simply doesn’t withstand the water…… and
> penetration occurs. This is the second time in the 10 years I have been
> living in the Marquis that the planter boxes have failed. Why even put
> plants and soil back in, only to have them taken out the next time the
> membrane fails? The cost of taking the soil and the plants out is extremely
> high and we simply cannot afford to keep doing this every 5 years.
>
>
>
> 1. These items cannot be removed with a Special resolution at a
> General Meeting as this would be a change/amendment to common property.
>
>
>
> Then lets sort out how to get them at whatever meeting is required. What
> meeting do we need to get them out? The combination of flat roofs on
> apartments and planter boxes simply don’t work together.
>
>
>
> 1. This would likely require a Development Application and would also
> require a Special Resolution at a General Meeting.
>
>
> Let’s investigate this for the future. In 5 years time, we will most
> probably run up against the same problem we’ve had for the last ten years
> (with 2 planter boxes completely being resurfaced) and at an increased
> cost. The water penetration issue from level 7 onto my terrace has been a
> nightmare for 10 years and having gone through this problem twice, I’ll
> have no other option than to go back to Tribunal to deal with the matter
> immediately.
>
>
>
>
>
> Items 2 & 3 are not items that can be actioned quickly, these would take
> some time to approve and have carried out.
>
>
>
> Then let’s get them actioned as soon as we can.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
>
>
> Phone: (02) 9266 2600 | Direct Phone: (02) 9266 2695 | Email:
> prush at stratatitle.com.au <northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address: PO
> Box 2727, Taren Point, NSW 2229
>
>
>
> [image: BSC_STM_logo_4c] [image:
> cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement> [image:
> cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm> [image:
> cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box]
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata> [image: pinterest.png]
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata> [image: google_plus.png]
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
>
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this email
> when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our website –
> www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the
> file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot
> that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is
> advised.
>
>
>
> *From:* Craig Laforest [mailto:cscl at optusnet.com.au]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 July 2017 8:37 AM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com; Patrick Rush <prush at stratatitle.com.au>
> *Subject:* Amendments to my email sent yesterday July 25, 2017 re level 7
> works
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To the EC,
>
>
>
> We have just received an updated quote from Preservation Technologies to
> ‘complete’ the extra works on level 7. Once again, I will state for the
> record…. to replant is ridiculous.
>
>
>
> We went through this problem 7 years ago and will most probably go through
> the same issue in another 7 years……at a similar cost (original cost as per
> Preservation Technologies first quote, *PLUS* the cost of now taking out
> the extra 2/3 of planter boxes above apartments 601 and 602 and
> redepositing plants/soil and extra membrane) ……if soil is tossed back in
> and plants are added. Expansion, cracking and water are the worst elements
> for planter boxes. Everyone has heard some sort of story that it is not
> effective to cover roofs with planter boxes.
>
>
>
> Also, repairing split pipes for the sink and BBQ which are NEVER used on
> level 7, is really not worthy of consideration.
>
>
>
> *My recommendations:*
>
> *1) Do not replant in the planter boxes*
>
> *2) Remove the BBQ and Sink*
>
> *3) Engage an engineer/obtain city permits to cover level 7 (as soon as
> possible in the future) to protect our building investment from future
> rain/water and sun damage.*
>
>
>
> I recommend further that we discuss this matter urgently before further
> works resume.
>
>
>
> Craig Laforest
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Matt Perkins
> *Sent:* Monday, 24 July 2017 11:15 AM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3
> Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
>
>
> Hi Patrick,
> Thanks for the follow up. I agree with the engineer that we are better
> off going for 2 Layer Torch on so as to improve the life. We previously got
> less then 10 years out of the Liquid for the cost It would be nice to get a
> longer period.
>
> Thanks for trying to save us some money Patrick on re-establishing the
> garden. We can use every saving we can.
>
> Matt.
>
>
> On 24/7/17 10:58 am, Patrick Rush wrote:
>
> Dear Committee,
>
>
>
> Please see below the responses from the questions posed by Craig from the
> Engineers that I received on Friday 21st July 2017 –
>
>
>
> 1. *Can we get comment from the engineer on their recommendation torch
> on vs liquid membrane? *
>
>
>
> * The liquid membrane is suitable but the torch on membrane
> offers a longer lifespan.*
>
> 1. *Refer to the tenders which Patrick Rush sent to us on Dec01, 2016
> - the differences in how much soil/plants had to be taken out vary
> significantly in size and cost. Based on what is in green below, all
> planter boxes should be emptied and new membrane put in. The existing
> planter box membrane has been proven to be deteriorated*
>
>
>
> *I have just spoken with Chris, the contractor from Preservation
> Technologies, and he has advised me that he has been told by the Engineer
> to only take out 5 metres of the plants from level 7 instead of the full
> length. He is stunned, as am I, as to why only 5 metres is to be taken out
> and a new membrane put down on this length only. I have stalactites
> hanging toward the other end of the planter box, nowhere near the area
> where plants have been taken out. Can you investigate and explain please
> asap.*
>
>
>
> *The planter boxes were flood tested by Cutler and Wright at the start of
> the year and found to not cause any leaks into the below units. Only 5m of
> the planters were removed to physically examine the condition of the
> waterproofing. If the waterproofing was found to be adequate no further
> work would be needed, saving the SC from these additional cost. However,
> the physical examination of the planter boxes showed the waterproofing has
> in fact deteriorated and would need replacement. Therefore this has been
> added to the meeting minutes as a consideration for the SC. The SC can
> decide if they would like to proceed with waterproofing the planter boxes
> at a variation cost to be provided by Prestech.*
>
>
>
> * Preservation Technology have provided the following:*
>
> - *Additional cost to remove and replace on completion the remaining
> plants and soil, prepare the substrate and install a 2 layer bitumen torch
> on membrane system to terrace above unit 601 - $25,237 + GST.*
> - *Additional cost to remove and replace on completion the
> remaining plants and soil, prepare the substrate and install a 2 layer
> bitumen torch on membrane system to terrace above unit 602 - $35,356 + GST*
>
>
>
> 1. *What does our engineer suggest we do for 2 or 3 layer torchings?*
>
>
>
> *I suggest the two layer for cost reasons only.*
>
>
>
>
>
> I have requested an urgent quote for just removing the soil form the
> planter boxes and undertaking the waterproofing rectification as it is
> likely less expensive to have a landscaper/gardener reinstate the planter
> boxes as per the discussion on site during their meeting to approve
> Preservation Technologies tender.
>
>
>
> I will advise on the amended quotes from the above once received from
> Preservation Technologies through the Engineers.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
>
>
> Phone: (02) 9266 2600 | DirectPhone: (02) 9266 2695 | Email:
> prush at stratatitle.com.au <northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address: PO
> Box 2727, Taren Point, NSW 2229
>
>
>
> [image: BSC_STM_logo_4c] [image:
> cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement> [image:
> cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm> [image:
> cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box]
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata> [image: pinterest.png]
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata> [image: google_plus.png]
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
>
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this email
> when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our website –
> www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the
> file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot
> that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is
> advised.
>
>
>
> *From:* Craig Laforest [mailto:cscl at optusnet.com.au <cscl at optusnet.com.au>]
>
> *Sent:* Monday, 17 July 2017 4:29 PM
> *To:* Patrick Rush <prush at stratatitle.com.au> <prush at stratatitle.com.au>
> *Cc:* ec at 200william.com
> *Subject:* FW: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3
> Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
>
>
> Hello Patrick,
>
> You mentioned that you would have a response to the request below by last
> Friday to send to us. Would you please advise where we stand with this
> important matter and also when the works on P4 will commence around my and
> Robin Patrick’s car and storage spaces.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Craig Laforest
>
>
>
> *From:* ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com
> <ec-bounces at 200william.com>] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Rush
> *Sent:* Thursday, 13 July 2017 4:54 PM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3
> Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
>
>
> Hi Craig & Matt,
>
>
> I have sent your queries to the Engineers to have a response back to you
> by tomorrow.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
>
>
> Phone: (02) 9266 2600 | DirectPhone: (02) 9266 2695 | Email:
> prush at stratatitle.com.au <northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address: PO
> Box 2727, Taren Point, NSW 2229
>
>
>
> [image: BSC_STM_logo_4c] [image:
> cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement> [image:
> cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm> [image:
> cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box]
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata> [image: pinterest.png]
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata> [image: google_plus.png]
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
>
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this email
> when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our website –
> www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the
> file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot
> that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is
> advised.
>
>
>
> *From:* ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Craig Laforest
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 July 2017 6:38 PM
> *To:* 'Matt Perkins' <matt at spectrum.com.au>; ec at 200william.com
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3
> Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
>
>
> Hello Patrick and EC members,
>
>
>
> I recommend the following:
>
>
>
> 1. Refer to the tenders which Patrick Rush sent to us on Dec01, 2016 -
> the differences in how much soil/plants had to be taken out vary
> significantly in size and cost. Based on what is in green below, all
> planter boxes should be emptied and new membrane put in. The existing
> planter box membrane has been proven to be deteriorated…..this was exactly
> the same situation about 5 years ago. Ridiculous that our engineer (after
> visiting my home at least 3 times) and seeing stalactites all the way along
> the edge of the overhang, didn’t state to each of the companies which
> submitted tenders that all the planter boxes should be emptied and new
> membrane installed.
>
>
>
> 2. I do not agree with Matt that all north facing balconies need to be
> repaired. We have had notice of one recently and we should treat each
> separately as each becomes critical. Are there any other balconies which
> are in a dire situation? I haven’t heard of any. Have you Patrick been
> informed of any?
>
>
>
> 3. What does our brilliant engineer suggest we do for 2 or 3 layer
> torchings (below)? I’m not an expert in this regard.
>
>
>
> Would all kind members of the EC respond asap.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Laforest
>
>
>
>
>
> I have just spoken with Chris, the contractor from Preservation
> Technologies, and he has advised me that he has been told by the Engineer
> to only take out 5 metres of the plants from level 7 instead of the full
> length. He is stunned, as am I, as to why only 5 metres is to be taken out
> and a new membrane put down on this length only. I have stalactites
> hanging toward the other end of the planter box, nowhere near the area
> where plants have been taken out. Can you investigate and explain please
> asap.
>
>
>
> The planter boxes were flood tested by Cutler and Wright at the start of
> the year and found to not cause any leaks into the below units. Only 5m of
> the planters were removed to physically examine the condition of the
> waterproofing. If the waterproofing was found to be adequate no further
> work would be needed, saving the SC from these additional cost. *However,
> the physical examination of the planter boxes showed the waterproofing has
> in fact deteriorated and would need replacement*. Therefore this has been
> added to the meeting minutes as a consideration for the SC. The SC can
> decide if they would like to proceed with waterproofing the planter boxes
> at a variation cost to be provided by Prestech.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Matt Perkins
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 July 2017 5:17 PM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3
> Request for Approval & Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
>
>
> Hi Patrick,
> Can we get comment from the engineer on their recommendation torch on vs
> liquid membrane. Also how does this sit within the budget given the works
> on P4 and also very likely works to all the north facing balcony's.
>
> Can we also get approval from the rest of the group regarding the
> engineers inspection of the north facing balcony's which seem to have the
> same problem as the roof.
>
> Matt
>
> On 11/7/17 5:06 pm, Patrick Rush wrote:
>
> Dear Committee,
>
>
>
> See attached the minutes of the meetings on site by Strata Engineering
> Solutions.
>
>
> The 1st set of minutes state that a variations was required on the
> demolition costs due to the additional work required to dispose of building
> material such as insulation, chicken wire, etc. As stated below and in the
> attached minutes this variation was required and the cost is highlighted
> below in blue as being $8,500.00 + GST (Variation 1).
>
>
> The 2nd set of minutes states that an additional variation will be
> required for the membrane to be installed on the podium as it was
> originally thought the membrane installed was not a torch on membrane and a
> cheaper option could be installed.
>
>
> Please review the below information, highlighted in green and confirm if
> you would prefer to go with Variation 2 or 3 for a torch on membrane with
> the only difference being the life span of the membrane for an additional
> layer for double the price?
>
>
>
>
>
> *Variation 2 -Extra over cost to install 2 layer torch on membrane instead
> of liquid membrane would be $4,981 + GST *
>
>
>
> *Variation 3 - Extra over cost to install 3 layer torch on membrane
> instead of liquid membrane would be $8,331 + GST *
>
>
>
>
>
> At this stage and until a decision on the above is made work at the
> property has ceased.
>
>
> Paul McKay will be attending the property in the coming days to provide
> further feedback on the planter boxes and if the waterproofing in these is
> required to be rectified.
>
>
> Please urgently advise on the above which will ultimately cause the
> attached schedule to be ameneded again?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
>
>
> Phone: (02) 9266 2600 | DirectPhone: (02) 9266 2695 | Email:
> prush at stratatitle.com.au <northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address: PO
> Box 2727, Taren Point, NSW 2229
>
>
>
> [image: BSC_STM_logo_4c] [image:
> cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement> [image:
> cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm> [image:
> cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box]
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata> [image: pinterest.png]
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata> [image: google_plus.png]
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
>
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this email
> when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our website –
> www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the
> file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot
> that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is
> advised.
>
>
>
> *From:* Patrick Rush [mailto:prush at stratatitle.com.au
> <prush at stratatitle.com.au>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 July 2017 12:29 PM
> *To:* Tanaz Dhondy <tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au>
> <tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au>
> *Cc:* Paul McKay <paul.mckay at costinroe.com.au>
> <paul.mckay at costinroe.com.au>; Darren Vignes <marquis at bfms.com.au>
> <marquis at bfms.com.au>
> *Subject:* SP 67851 - URGENT Variations 2 & 3 Request for Approval &
> Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Hi Tanaz,
>
>
> Before I send the below and attached to the Committee, can you please
> confirm the cost of Variation 1 and what this was for?
>
> Cost for disposal of the additional building material (i.e. insulation,
> chicken wire and drainage cell) $8,500+GST
>
>
> Can you provided an updated work schedule?
>
> Prestech will update their work schedule based on the SC determining what
> work they would like us to proceed with.
>
>
>
> Can you also advise on the below comments from an Owner that received
> yesterday –
>
>
>
> *I have just spoken with Chris, the contractor from Preservation
> Technologies, and he has advised me that he has been told by the Engineer
> to only take out 5 metres of the plants from level 7 instead of the full
> length. He is stunned, as am I, as to why only 5 metres is to be taken out
> and a new membrane put down on this length only. I have stalactites
> hanging toward the other end of the planter box, nowhere near the area
> where plants have been taken out. Can you investigate and explain please
> asap.*
>
>
>
> The planter boxes were flood tested by Cutler and Wright at the start of
> the year and found to not cause any leaks into the below units. Only 5m of
> the planters were removed to physically examine the condition of the
> waterproofing. If the waterproofing was found to be adequate no further
> work would be needed, saving the SC from these additional cost. However,
> the physical examination of the planter boxes showed the waterproofing has
> in fact deteriorated and would need replacement. Therefore this has been
> added to the meeting minutes as a consideration for the SC. The SC can
> decide if they would like to proceed with waterproofing the planter boxes
> at a variation cost to be provided by Prestech.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Patrick Rush*
>
> Senior Community Manager
>
>
>
> Phone: (02) 9266 2600 | DirectPhone: (02) 9266 2695 | Email:
> prush at stratatitle.com.au <northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address: PO
> Box 2727, Taren Point, NSW 2229
>
>
>
> [image: BSC_STM_logo_4c] [image:
> cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement> [image:
> cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm> [image:
> cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box]
> <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata> [image: pinterest.png]
> <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata> [image: google_plus.png]
> <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>
>
>
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this email
> when relating to a client matter.
>
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our website –
> www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the
> file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot
> that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is
> advised.
>
>
>
> *From:* Tanaz Dhondy [mailto:tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au
> <tanaz.dhondy at costinroe.com.au>]
> *Sent:* Friday, 7 July 2017 6:37 PM
> *To:* 'Marquis' <Marquis at bfms.com.au>; Patrick Rush <
> prush at stratatitle.com.au>
> *Cc:* Paul McKay <paul.mckay at costinroe.com.au>; Kristine Naylor <
> knaylor at smartercommunities.com.au>
> *Subject:* Meeting Minutes 07.07.17
>
>
>
> *CO12765.00*
>
> *200 Willliam St, Woolloomooloo*
>
>
>
> Hi Patrick/Darren,
>
>
>
> Please see attached meeting minutes from today’s meeting.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tanaz
>
>
>
> ...
>
> [Message clipped]
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170802/6839e2df/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3125 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170802/6839e2df/attachment-0003.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4502 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170802/6839e2df/attachment-0005.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4236 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170802/6839e2df/attachment-0006.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1488 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170802/6839e2df/attachment-0007.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3977 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170802/6839e2df/attachment-0008.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1725 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170802/6839e2df/attachment-0009.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170802/6839e2df/attachment-0004.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7539 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20170802/6839e2df/attachment-0005.jpg
More information about the EC
mailing list