[200William-EC SP67851] Sinking Fund budget

[Rob Willett]

Thanks a lot Ed, we realise how busy you are in your real job so the time you are spending sorting this through for us with your expertise is very gratefully appreciated. I am 100% on-board with you changing suppliers for any on-going reports. FYI, we have no contract or allegiance to Solutions in Engineering. So from my side, please feel free to do what you need to do. I expect the fellow EC members would have no issues with a new supplier. 

Many thanks Ed and Happy New Year, 

Regards, ROB





On 5 Jan 2015, at 5:47 pm, Ed Sainsbury <edsainsbury at ozemail.com.au> wrote:

> Dear EC,
>  
> Over the break I looked at the revised Marquis BMC Sinking Fund Plan (30 Oct 2014) supplied by Solutions In Engineering, for our cash flow budget. I compared this to the Marquis BMC Sinking Fund Plan (15 Jul 2014). Then compared this to the (Resi) “Sinking Fund Plan Update
> For Owners Corporation Strata Plan 67851” (26 Jul 2014)
>  
> The main issue is that the revised BMC sinking fund report has the Resi Owners Corp contributing an additional ~$80k in 2016, from the original report. And as such, does not correlate to the Owners Corp report’s Contribution per Unit Entitlement.
>  
> As a result I have called Solutions In Engineering today to question which Contribution per Unit Entitlement they are using; that achieves the additional $80k in 2016. I am also going through the report so that they can label tables appropriately etc. I am also speaking with Pia to confirm what the Contribution per Unit Entitlement she has on record for her calculations to see if they marry up to one report or the other.
>  
> I will wait until I hear back from Solutions In Engineering. I am expecting a call tomorrow. In future I feel that we may use a different provider for these reports, as they are not up to the standard I would like, however I will wait to see if we can sort the layout and scope of any future reports.
>  
> Once I know what our Contributions are, I can confirm the budget. This will show how much money is available for a refresh and design.
>  
> Regards,
> Edward Sainsbury

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20150106/765bc291/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ROB19732_RobEmailSig.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20150106/765bc291/attachment-0001.jpg