[200William-EC SP67851] Notice from Fair Trading to attend mediation.

Pia Cunningham pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au
Tue Oct 21 09:18:13 EST 2014


Hi Edward,

We would only be able to enforce this against visitors if they are not parked in the visitor parking spaces.

Correct that the building manager will need to keep a record of cars owned by residents of the building.


Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.



Have a nice day,



Pia Cunningham

Strata Manager and
Company Title Manager



[cid:image001.jpg at 01CFADA3.7A095460]



[cid:image002.png at 01CFADA3.7A095460]<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>   [cid:image003.jpg at 01CFADA3.7A095460] <https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag>    [cid:image004.png at 01CFADA3.7A095460] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home>    [cid:image005.jpg at 01CFADA3.7A095460] <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>



t:   (02) 9266 2600<tel:(02)%209266%202600>

www.stratatitle.com.au<http://www.stratatitle.com.au/>

www.stmplus.com.au<http://www.stmplus.com.au/>



Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer

For STM’s full disclaimer please visit –http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp



Important Notice:  Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.





[cid:image006.jpg at 01CFADA3.7A095460]

On 20 Oct 2014, at 6:28 pm, Edward Sainsbury <edwardsainsbury at hotmail.com<mailto:edwardsainsbury at hotmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Pia,

My understanding is that it would not apply to visitors, and if that is the case, George would need to keep a register of vehicles owned/operated by tenants to be able to enforce this.

The by-law would not catch all parties, for example the Pack and Save van, who are not party to our Strata Plan or it's by-law, could not be towed it clamped. Visitors could not be clamped or towed. So the only people are residents who would be effected.

I would also like to understand the rules and remedies around the proposed by-law, as the devil is often in the detail. Would you please supply the EC with this in preparation for the EGM.

Thank you for your efforts,
Edward

Sent from my iPhone

On 20 Oct 2014, at 10:23 am, Brook Beves <brookbeves at bigpond.com<mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com>> wrote:

On 20/10/14 09:40, Pia Cunningham wrote:
Ok Thanks Matt,

So I will seek its immediate removal.

Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Have a nice day,

Pia Cunningham
Strata Manager and
Company Title Manager

<mime-attachment.jpg>

<mime-attachment.png><http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>   <mime-attachment.jpg><https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag>   <mime-attachment.png><http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home>   <mime-attachment.jpg><https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>

t:   (02) 9266 2600
www.stratatitle.com.au<http://www.stratatitle.com.au>
www.stmplus.com.au<http://www.stmplus.com.au>

Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
For STM’s full disclaimer please visit – http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp

Important Notice:  Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.


<mime-attachment.jpg>

From: ec-bounces at 200william.com<mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com> [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On Behalf Of Matt Perkins
Sent: Monday, 20 October 2014 9:36 AM
To: ec at 200william.com<mailto:ec at 200william.com>
Subject: Re: [200William-EC SP67851] Notice from Fair Trading to attend mediation.

The problem is not one of damage to the building.  The problem is that the screen blocks his neighbors view of the Harbor and bridge.  He put the screen there because of there ongoing war that has raged between them over the last two years that has resulted in police criminal  charges toward him for malicious damage  and an apprehended violence order.



On 20/10/2014 9:27 am, Pia Cunningham wrote:
Good Morning,

Yes, I have the files and will be attending mediation this Wednesday on behalf of the owners corporation.

I do need further instruction though. Do we want he immediate removal or are we willing to allow it on the basis that a by law is accepted to protect the owners corporation from any damage?

Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Have a nice day,

Pia Cunningham
Strata Manager and
Company Title Manager

<mime-attachment.jpg>

<mime-attachment.png><http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>   <mime-attachment.jpg><https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag>   <mime-attachment.png><http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home>   <mime-attachment.jpg><https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>

t:   (02) 9266 2600
www.stratatitle.com.au<http://www.stratatitle.com.au>
www.stmplus.com.au<http://www.stmplus.com.au>

Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
For STM’s full disclaimer please visit – http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp

Important Notice:  Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.


<mime-attachment.jpg>

From: ec-bounces at 200william.com<mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com> [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On Behalf Of Rob Willett
Sent: Monday, 20 October 2014 5:54 AM
To: ec at 200william.com<mailto:ec at 200william.com> ec at 200william.com<mailto:ec at 200william.com>
Subject: [200William-EC SP67851] Notice from Fair Trading to attend mediation.

Brook,

Thanks very much for your expertise on this.

Pia, can you confirm you have the relevant files for the hearing and that you are acting on this instruction.

Many thanks

ROB


<mime-attachment.jpg>


On 19 Oct 2014, at 4:44 am, Brook Beves <brookbeves at bigpond.com<mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com>> wrote:



On 18/10/14 20:25, Matt Perkins wrote:


Hi All,
  I have received a notice from Fair Trading stuffed into my mail box.
(which I dont check or publish so it must have come from Mr Laforest) I
have a po box.

It is a notice to appear before mediation regarding the matter of the
screen on 601's balcony.

File No SM14/1407RG SP 67851

Pia. Is this something you do on our behalf or do I have to attend this.
It's addressed to the Secretary.  I have a full day of meetings that day
and can not attend. I think Brook was interested in representing us and
I have no problem with that.


The mediation is scheduled  for 10AM on Wednesday 22nd of October 2014
at Level 13 175 Castlereagh Street Sydney.


Matt.

_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com<mailto:EC at 200william.com>
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
Hi Matt, Pia and all

I will not be in Sydney on the 22nd October the scheduled day for this
mediation, however, I recall reading an email from Pia saying she was
appearing on our behalf.

Pia, I would suggest the following tactics at the mediation if the
matter proceeds.

Firstly, LaForest is going assert that this screen has been there for
some years and he will rely upon the 2 photographs that he has
tendered.  The photograph which purports to be taken some years ago does
not clearly show the screen jutting out to the balcony railing.  Diana
Denison (the complainant) should really be appearing to inform the
mediator that this screen has only appeared in sight from her side of
the balcony when this matter was brought to the attention of the EC back
in early July.

Secondly, a video was taken (I think by Dianas friend Phil) from their
side of the balcony showing this screen jutting out past the separating
brick wall of the 2 balconies and it also shows this screen flapping
uncontrollably in the wind.  That video is critical to these proceedings
and should be shown to the mediator.

Regards
Brook


_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com<mailto:EC at 200william.com>
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec





_______________________________________________

EC mailing list

EC at 200william.com<mailto:EC at 200william.com>

http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec




--

/* Matt Perkins

        Direct 1300 137 379     Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.

        Office 1300 133 299     matt at spectrum.com.au<mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>

                                Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000

        PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at  http://pgp.mit.edu

*/



_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com<mailto:EC at 200william.com>
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec


Good morning Pia

I agree with Matt that you seek the removal of this screen.
Correctly stated, LaForest put that screen in that place to antagonize his neighbour Diana Denison against whom he has held a vendetta ever since he was charged by the police last year of "malicious damage to property" and was placed on a good behaviour bond by the court.

Brook
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20141021/a9518b76/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the EC mailing list