[200William-EC SP67851] Access for first path fiber to 200 William Street.

[Rob Willett]

Hey Matt

Personally I don’t see a conflict of interest. I think we are lucky enough to have someone on the EC with your expertise in this area. I think it is time to upgrade our building and therefore I am happy to go with your recommendations in terms of providers. 

I like the idea of choice for all owners and tenants.

ROB 





On 15 May 2014, at 8:35 pm, Matt Perkins <matt at spectrum.com.au> wrote:

> Hi All,
>  I was chatting to the CEO of First Path.  First path are a wholesale 
> only fiber provider and carrier who provide services to buildings 
> throughout Australia. They are a non exclusive carrier unlike TPG and 
> allow anyone to use there equipment.  Providers on First path fiber 
> include all the major players.
> 
> First path have approached me about doing a site servery at 200 William 
> to provide fiber into the building and allow their customers to provide 
> access to tenants within our building. First Path Services do not 
> interferer with other services in the building. Nobody would need to 
> churn to first path or do anything at all if they didn't want to. No one 
> is forced to do anything.  The first path build would also be free of 
> charge to the building.
> 
> First Path only wholesale services any  ISP's can use First Path to 
> deliver service's so the building get's high speeds and the flexibility 
> to use any provider they wish for services. First path also provide 
> fiber to the home NBN style service if customers request them.
> 
> They will send through land access forms within the next few days. It 
> would be a good alternative to TPG/Pipe as they do  not require 
> exclusive use of there network. However neither providers are exclusive 
> in that  the existing infrastructure remains. If you want to stay on 
> Telstra you can. etc.
> 
> Again I must point out that a business I have a major stake in is one of 
> First Path's major customers and if any of my customers wanted to buy 
> services within our building they would use first path. There may be a 
> conflict of interest here and I just want to state that for the record.
> 
> I would strongly recommend we allow First Path access to the building.
> 
> Matt.
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140516/75cac1fd/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ROB19732_RobEmailSig.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140516/75cac1fd/attachment-0001.jpg