[200William-EC SP67851] Building Upgrades Subcommittee

[Ed Sainsbury]

Hello,

 

I would agree that 4 week’s notice is reasonable and allows for people to dial in or attend.

 

Regards,

Edward

 

From: Barney Kitay [mailto:barnet at kitays.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 1:37 PM
To: ec at 200william.com
Subject: Re: [200William-EC SP67851] Building Upgrades Subcommittee

 

Hi All,

this is the exact reason i asked Maxine 2 years ago that more than 2 weeks notice for the AGM is provided. i very nearly did not open my mail in time.

Just because a minimum of 2 weeks notice is required does not mean we ONLY give 2 weeks notice (incl postage time). it is very easy to send the notice, minutes and agenda out 4 weeks before, and then follow up with the SMS we received for the 1st time last week... this will give everyone time to keep the date open or time to make changes to other appointments.

i propose we make this a requirement of our strata managers in the future.

 

---

Kind Regards
 
Barney
m:  +61 (0)400 200 446
e:   barnet at kitays.com
==================================================

On 07-05-2014 21:07, Rob Willett wrote:

 

 

Absolutely 100% in favour Matt,  

 

I was actually disappointed he never made it last night and is not on the EC for this year. 

 

So Go for it as far as I am concerned. 

 

 














 





 

On 7 May 2014, at 6:58 pm, Matt Perkins <matt at spectrum.com.au> wrote:





Hi All,
 Rowan contacted me tonight regarding the AGM apparently he did not 
check his mail box and was unaware of the AGM. As a result missed out on 
the meeting and elections. As we all know Rowan has been a key driver 
heading up the building upgrades subcommittee and has done a lot of hard 
work in that area with the comity.  He has also been a valued member of 
the EC.

As Rowan did not make it to the meeting or nominate he has missed out on 
the EC. However I see no reason why he could not play a roll on the 
building upgrades subcommittee. It would not give him any voting rights 
on the EC. However I believe his contribution in this area is valuable 
and it would be a shame to waste all the effort he has put in so far.

If everyone is in favor and if there is no legal impediment  I would 
like to make this offer to him to be part of the building upgrades group 
not a formal member of the EC as such but just an adviser to that 
specific group effectively continuing his roll as groups organizer.

What are your thoughts.


_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec

 

_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140508/3fa9cfb8/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140508/3fa9cfb8/attachment-0001.jpe