[200William-EC SP67851] FTTB Feasibility Study: MARQUIS_200 William St

[Dave Petschack]

Thanks Matt for the informed email.
I ma happy to go with Pipe/TPG. 
Look forward to discussing more at meeting on Thursday.

Regards Dave




On 12/08/2014, at 5:15 PM, Matt Perkins wrote:

> Hi All,
>  We should go ahead and meet TPG for the site survey. We in fact have no choice They have served land access under the Telecommunications act. This will happen weather we want it to or not. It will cost us a bucked load to try and stop it and we will be unsuccessful.  
> 
> Overall as with the First path install it's good for the building. Brings more competition and reduces prices. It's also likely to be installed faster then First path now as the owner of 601 has delayed them by quite a while for residential services with the ACMA . I can explain further at the meeting if anyone likes. However Pipe's attached documentation is on the accurate. 
> 
> Things we can get in our favor once pipe present us with a contract are. 
>  - Make them pay for electricity. 
>  - Make them pay rent for use of the MDF space. 
> 
> Personally I am not in favor of either as its marginal space and electricity and again adds benefits to the building. If you look at it like this. Foxtel ask that you pay for the infrastructure in the building and provide only a few channels in a monopoly environment.  People like TPG and Pipe do it for free and give you the entire internet. 
> 
> As a disclaimer I am affiliated with First Path as my company is a wholesaler I am also affiliated with Pipe Networks as my company is a wholesaler. However Pipe Networks will only grant use of this fiber in this case to TPG Telecom (who own Pipe Networks BTW)  So i in fact have a conflict of interested in that it's in my interest to have First path in the building and not Pipe/TPG. Never the less they should both go ahead. 
> 
> It's also incorrect to say that once Pipe/TPG have installed you must go to Pipe/TPG this is totally incorrect. You can still stay on Telstra dialup or Telix if you want. No one is forcing anyone to go to any carrier. It's just giving us more options. 
>    
> Matt.
> 
> 
> On 12/08/2014 4:40 pm, Maxine Wickey wrote:
>> Dear Committee,
>>  
>> Please find following and attached correspondence, please review for discussion on Thursday.
>>  
>> Kind Regards,
>>  
>> Maxine Wickey
>> Strata Manager
>>  
>> <Mail Attachment.jpeg>
>>  
>> <Mail Attachment.png>   <Mail Attachment.jpeg>   <Mail Attachment.png>   <Mail Attachment.jpeg>    
>>  
>> t:   (02) 9266 2600
>> www.stratatitle.com.au
>> www.stmplus.com.au
>>  
>> Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
>> For STM’s full disclaimer please visit – http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>  
>> Important Notice:  Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>>  
>> From: James Ho [mailto:James.Ho at pipenetworks.com] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2014 12:08 PM
>> To: Maxine Wickey
>> Cc: Craig Gudgeon
>> Subject: FTTB Feasibility Study: MARQUIS_200 William St
>> Importance: High
>>  
>> Hi Maxine,
>>  
>> A very good day to you.
>>  
>> Introduction
>> In conjunction with our exercise of upgrading & maintaining communication equipment across Sydney suburbs, PIPE Networks have been assigned to install new fibre optic infrastructure on behalf of TPG. TPG is a telecommunication service provider and plans to upgrade existing TPG customers within your building, Marquis, to high-speed fibre optic broadband at no cost.
>>  
>>  
>> Feasibility Study
>> PIPE intends to perform a feasibility study on the location.  As the equipment used in this Fibre-To-The-Basement(FTTB) infrastructure upgrade exercise is very expensive, we wish to ensure that any installation activity carried out for the benefit of our subscribers can be effected in an economic manner. This also saves time as the proposal forwarded is complete from a construction perspective & any unique building requirements can be addressed pre-emptively.
>>  
>> Our contractors attempted access on the 8th August as per the Site Inspection LAAN that was served to your office. As per his feedback, you kindly requested for a formal request providing further clarity in regards to our inspection, before access can be allowed. This email is a response to that request & we have attached additional informative attachments for your kind perusal.
>>  
>>  
>> Takeaway
>> We would like to rearrange a site inspection date with your good self. Tentatively on this Friday, 15th August 2014, perhaps?
>>  
>> Kindly confirm. I am available if you require any further information.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Warm regards,
>>  
>> James Ho
>> Project Officer
>> PIPE Networks Pty Limited - A TPG Telecom Limited Company (ASX: TPM)
>> 
>>  
>> Fibre Operations & Provisioning Group is Quality endorsed by the ISO 9001:2008 certification
>> Phone: +61 2 8916 3222
>> Web: www.pipenetworks.com
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Any information transmitted in this message and its attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The above email correspondence should be read in conjunction with our standard disclaimer/terms which can be found at www.pipenetworks.com/docs/disclaimer.htm
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> /* Matt Perkins 
>         Direct 1300 137 379     Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd. 
>         Office 1300 133 299     matt at spectrum.com.au 
>                                 Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
>         PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at  http://pgp.mit.edu 
> */
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140812/3f8707ee/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ROB19732_DaveEmailSig.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20664 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140812/3f8707ee/attachment-0001.jpg