[200William-EC] Car Park photos
George Ziri
Georgeziri at bfms.com.au
Thu Nov 28 19:36:16 EST 2013
During my visit today i was unsuccessful contacting the tenant in 502 as
no one was home.
Though Maxine has the letter in motion.
________________________________________________________
George Ziri | Operations
Building Facilities Management Solutions Pty Ltd
Direct: 0400 300 242 | Facsimile: 9547 3132 | PO BOX A2319 SYDNEY SOUTH
NSW 1235
visit us www.bfms.com.au <http://www.bfms.com.au>
From: ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On
Behalf Of Rob Willett
Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2013 7:31 PM
To: ec at 200william.com
Subject: [200William-EC] Car Park photos
Hi Maxine and EC
Here are the photos of that woman parking in the car park ( thank you Di
and Phil for taking the images ) please issue a breach notice and an
invoice for a month of parking at $ 120 per week + GST. These funds will
go to the sinking fund.
Can you please arrange this fairly quickly so we can nip this in the
bud.
In the meantime Brook and Daniel are liaising in order to get a cost for
installing brackets. We are not denying anyone visitor parking by doing
this. We are just controlling it and gaining vital revenue from it. Once
we get the costs in we can decide how many spots we leave fro tradesmen
/ visitors.
Maxine, can you please get back to me relating to the City of Sydney re
my previous email. How do we, or who do we contact to see the Visitor
minimum spots required. We had 40 apartments in Panorama and there were
2 spots, neither was for visitors, it was for tradesmen working in the
building.
Personally, I don't see the big deal about making visitors take care of
their own parking. It's not our problem. But that's just me believing
it's about time we all took responsibilities for ourselves. Visitors to
the building are not victims and don't need our hand out with free
parking. If tenants in the building want to provide free parking, get a
house in the burbs. This is inner city living and this is what happens,
space is a premium and should be paid for.
IN SRI LANKA / CELL PHONE +94 766 88 92 98
5.5 HOURS BEHIND SYDNEY / 10.5 HOURS AHEAD NEW YORK
On 27/11/2013, at 9:49 AM, Rob Willett <rob at robadda.com> wrote:
OK, how do we check the City of Sydney, where do I go to find details?
Happy to get jump this hurdle too.
Is someone able to send Maxine the photos she needs, I would be happy to
do so bunt I am not in Sydney at the moment
<ROB19732_RobEmailSig.jpg>
IN SRI LANKA / CELL PHONE +94 766 88 92 98
5.5 HOURS BEHIND SYDNEY / 10.5 HOURS AHEAD NEW YORK
On 27/11/2013, at 9:38 AM, Maxine Wickey <mwickey at stratatitle.com.au>
wrote:
Hi Rob,
We issue breach notices if advised. In relation to the visitors
carspaces you may need to check - it may have beena condition of council
that there be visitors carspaces.
If someone can send me a photo of the resident parking there I will send
the notice.
Regards,
Maxine Wickey
Strata Manager
<image001.jpg>
<image002.png>
<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#!/page
s/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212> <image003.jpg>
<https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag> <image004.png>
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_na
v_home> <image005.jpg> <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>
t: (02) 9540 4199
www.stratatitle.com.au <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/>
www.stmplus.com.au <http://www.stmplus.com.au/>
Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
For STM's full disclaimer please visit -
http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
<http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp>
Important Notice: Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on
the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any
lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion
is advised.
From: ec-bounces at 200william.com <mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com>
[mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com <mailto:bounces at 200william.com> ] On
Behalf Of Rob Willett
Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2013 2:18 PM
To: ec at 200william.com ec at 200william.com
Subject: [200William-EC] Car Park
Car park: OK, we're all in agreement, I think the first and easiest step
to stop illegal parking is to put those yellow bracket locks ( thats the
best description I could come up with ). We offer the spaces for lease.
They get a key to unlock their space. It's really simple although I am
guessing in Nanny State Australia there will be some rule or bi-law or
bloody regulation that says it's not easy.
Let's stop buggarising around with the narcissicist in 502. Send them a
warning notice immediately to stop parking there. If they don't, stick a
wheel lock on her car. Can someone do this? Let me have her details ands
I will GLADLY do it. Here she is renting a spot, the revenue should be
coming to us, not her. We have evidence of her parking there, thanks
Phil and Di, lets send her an invoice. Let's immediately install the
brackets. Lets immediately notify the residents that spaces are
available for a weekly monthly rental of $300 + GST, minimum 3 months,
key deposit $200 + GST ( fully refundable ). We are not obliged to
provide visitors spots. So don't. If we just get on with it, it can
happen so quickly no one will no the difference.
I think I am saying let's actually do something. The time has come.
I will start by contacting a supplier to give us a cost for the
brackets. As I am not in Sydney, would it be possible for someone to
allow access to the contractor so they can see the spaces in order to
quote on the job? I just need 1 person who lives in the building. We can
arrange a mutually agreeable time. It will take 5 minutes.
Who issues invoices on behalf of the building? Is it Maxine, is it
George? I would be happy to do it. Just tell me what to do and I will
issue the invoice on behalf of the EC. I just need the woman's details
and I will do it right away. $75 per week ( cheap ) for 8 weeks + GST (
based on the evidence we have )
<image006.jpg>
IN SRI LANKA / CELL PHONE +94 766 88 92 98
5.5 HOURS BEHIND SYDNEY / 10.5 HOURS AHEAD NEW YORK
On 27/11/2013, at 7:30 AM, Brook Beves <brookbeves at bigpond.com
<mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com> > wrote:
Visitor Parking Spaces:
I am in total agreement to lease them out and derive income for the Body
corporate. Currently there is no way to police people using them as
they wish. As Matt says, there is already some selfish occupant within
the building who has rented out their car space and selfishly plonks
their vehicle in a visitors space without any regard for anyone else.
Whilst George goes to a lot of trouble taking photos and attaching
notices to every occupants door threatening action, the offenders just
ignore/laugh at the notice. This also goes for other selfish occupants
who don't give a damn and just park in the visitors spots for indefinite
times. I too have had occasion when a guest to my apartment cannot park
their vehicle because of the selfish actions/disregard by others.
Storage Cages:
I am in total agreement to Lease them out. They legally belong to the
Owners Corporation. Whilst I have raised this issue previously this
problem will not go away and it may well be that another owner, in the
future or whenever, will ask the same question as I, as to who owns them
and how do you get hold of one.
Rooftop Barbeque:
I agree that this needs to be more attractive and on a user pay basis.
I don't consider this a priority.
Rooftop Gymnasium:
Again I agree this needs to be made more attractive and on a user pay
basis, and perhaps placed on the EC agenda for follow up action.
IN SUMMARY:
I agree with Rob that the current levies for a building of this type is
totally over the top, and where there is areas to derive income for the
body corporate, then I am all in favour of pursuing those possibilities.
As we agreed at the last EC meeting the installation of the CCTV cameras
to the foyers on each floor is the only evidence the police can use to
prosecute criminal and malicious behaviour, as we have recently
witnessed. I am happy to support the best quote for this installation.
Brook
om: ec-bounces at 200william.com <mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com>
[mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com <mailto:bounces at 200william.com> ] On
Behalf Of Diana Dennison
Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2013 10:51 AM
To: Dave Petschack
Cc: ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
Subject: Re: [200William-EC] Recovery of costs 200 William Street
I do feel that the 5 visitor parking places should remain just that (as
part of the appeal of the building, along with the roof access, etc) and
we should work out a way to ensure they remain for visitors' use with a
24hr limit.
We just want to make sure we don"t have a repetition of the woman who
bought a house lower down Dowling St, then bought the 2 commercial
spots, let the vendor remain in one, parked herself in the visitors' and
brought in tradies each morning who were working on her house down to
park in other visitors' spots !!
Tradies working in the building are another matter, and I think they
should be tolerated.
In the next email I'll attach some evidence of the same car parked in
the a visitor's spot since the 16th Nov.
regards,
Di
On 27 November 2013 10:37, Dave Petschack <dave at robadda.com
<mailto:dave at robadda.com> > wrote:
Thanks to all for their thought and feedback - some great ideas.
I am particularly in favour of having a more managed approach to spare
parking spaces and I would be keen to let these out if possible. the
income would be very handy.
I agree about a fee for renting out the cages - should have done it
years ago - good idea Matt!
Re the gym - it has always been a white elephant, but perhaps we
consider a proper upgrade and a user pays. I think this would make
people look after the equipment and restrict access to those who
appreciate a gym.
BBQ - area - i think the upgrade needs to be taken into consideration
with some of the other renovations before making a decision. This woul
be a low priority for me after security and foyer works.
Thanks again all, Maxine, would you please add these ideas to the agenda
for discussion as a group at next EC meeting.
Regards Dave
<image001.jpg>
On 26/11/2013, at 4:46 PM, Matt Perkins wrote:
Hi All,
This is a bit of a knock-on from Rob's last email where he questioned
costs of the upgrading of the building cameras. There seems a real
problem here as the owners want reduced strata costs however our
building is small and there is not that many lots to spread the cost
over. There is not a lot of breathing room in the budget and owners want
more facilities, Building upgrades and security features. We have
little way to recoup some of these cost's other then strata levies
however perhaps there are some options for us. It's of note that these
suggestions will almost certainly require a bylaw change in it self will
have an associated cost.
User Pays.
Brook recently brought up the idea of Cages that are on common property.
lets lease these to people rather then giving them away. They have real
value. It's not unreasnoable to ask $20 ~ $50 Per month for these in our
Sydney location. This could add up to a few thousand per year. I note
also that there are a few store rooms and other spaces throughout the
building that are utilized. I for one would be happy to rent one of
these. Let's put some figures on them and get them rented. It's money
for jam.
Gym - If we plan to fix/upgrade it. Perhaps we can charge people a
maintenance fee if they use it. If they dont want to pay for it lets
turn it into more storage space and save the P/L and Insurance. It's a
simple matter of putting a card reader on the Gym Door and activating it
on lots that pay only. It should at least cover the insurance and P/L
Visitor parking - This is constantly used as parking for tenants. Evey
time I have tried to get a visitor in there it's full of the usual
suspects. Perhaps some sort of user pay's system would work here. I have
no idea how but throwing it out there. At the very least a nominal fee
may stop people using it as additional car spaces. I know for a fact
that one tenant in the building is renting their space to an outside
person and using visitor parking for there own car.
The Roof - We have discussed user pays here before. My thoughts is it
would have little chance of making it through a AGM/EGM as it's to
attractive as a selling point for property in the building. But if
upgrades were to happen the BBQ should at least have a coin box.
Other property have done some of these measure nearby to great effect.
(Particularly storage).
Matt
--
/* Matt Perkins
Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
Office 1300 133 299 matt at spectrum.com.au
<mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>
Fax 1300 133 255 Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
SIP 1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au
<mailto:1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au>
PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at http://pgp.mit.edu
<http://pgp.mit.edu/>
*/
_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com <mailto:EC at 200william.com>
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
<http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec>
_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com <mailto:EC at 200william.com>
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
<http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec>
_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com <mailto:EC at 200william.com>
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
<http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20131128/ed451b96/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20131128/ed451b96/attachment-0002.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 312290 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20131128/ed451b96/attachment-0003.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Maxine Wickey" <mwickey at stratatitle.com.au>
Subject: FW: SP 67851 200 William St car park Photo
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:45:46 +1100
Size: 4462380
Url: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20131128/ed451b96/attachment-0001.mht
More information about the EC
mailing list