[200William-EC] SP 67851 EC Minutes
Tony Araujo
TAraujo at cityviewrealestate.com.au
Thu Sep 6 15:24:53 EST 2012
Here we go again,
Sorry guys but Rowan clear stated that there is smell originated by one
dog, Imagine 10? Well I assume that we are going to have a big fight in
this issue as we had in the past. So a motion has to be put to an
extraordinary G. Meeting and only then the by-law can be changed.
5 Year ago we went through this and the owners 9 to 1 made a clear
decision not to allow pets, so if anyone wants to go through this again
then so be it because it will fail.
Regards
Tony Araujo
M. Director & Licensee-in-charge
CityView Real Estate & Property Investments Pty Ltd
Shop 2/25-35 Park Rd
HURSTVILLE NSW 2220
Ph:02 9586 4622 Fax:02 9586 4633 M:04144 92080
Web: www.cityviewrealestate.com.au
<http://www.cityviewrealestate.com.au/>
E-mail: tony at cityviewrealestate.com.au
<mailto:tony at cityviewrealestate.com.au>
Facebook: www.facebook.com/cityviewhurstville
From: ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On
Behalf Of Matt Perkins
Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2012 2:42 PM
To: ec at 200william.com
Subject: Re: [200William-EC] SP 67851 EC Minutes
I completely agree with Craig here. Pet's are an individual owners
responsibility providing they do not effect others. I would be in favor
of a change of bylaw to allow pets as approved by the owners corporation
in writing. That way we can insure pets are fit for purpose for want of
a better term. I believe that allowing pets is attractive to some owners
especially the elderly that would otherwise not purchase within the
building. I know that's why my parents didn't look at some recent for
sales in the building.
To the matter of the tenant in 104 I have not noticed the dog causing
any trouble so happy for it to stay as long as there are no adverse
reports from the cleaner or noise complaints from others. I have also
noticed some cats from time to time but again they have caused me no
problems.
So if it's a vote as to "do nothing" about the current bi law breach i
vote in favor of doing nothing.
If it's a future vote at the AGM to change the bylaws to allow pets as
approved in writing by the owners corp i vote in favor.
Matt.
On 6/09/12 12:39 PM, CSCL wrote:
Greetings everyone,
Thank you Maxine - it was great to have you at the meeting to
add your experience and to also put the minutes together.
I know there is quite a bit of contention regarding animals in
the building. However, I personally don't have any issue with a dog or
cat living on the premises. Many tenants live by themselves and enjoy a
companion pet. If it really becomes a question of cleanliness of pets,
I recommend the owner can simply ask for a higher bond. My suggestion
is that we become more like a luxury New York apartment building and
change this bi-law!
Cheers,
Craig
From: ec-bounces at 200william.com [
mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On Behalf Of Maxine Wickey
Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2012 11:14 AM
To: ec at 200william.com
Subject: [200William-EC] SP 67851 EC Minutes
Dear Committee,
Please find attached the Minutes of the EC Meeting.
Also attached is the breach of by-law issued to the tenant of
unit 104 along with the tenants response. Please advise if you agree
with him to continue minding the dog.
In relation to the meeting for the BMC due to time restraints as
specified within the Strata Management Statement notice must be not less
than 7 days which does not include allowing postage. As Rob will be
away until end of October I will organise the meeting with Matt and
Andrew.
The SMS state that a quorum is as follows:
2.8 At any meeting of the Building Management Committee a quorum
will be constituted if both Owners are represented. If a quorum is not
present within half an hour from the time appointed for a meeting, the
meeting will be adjourned for 2 Business Days to be held at the same
time and at the same place notified for the original meeting.
Section 11 of the SMS is for Dispute Resolution as follows:
11.1 Notice of Dispute
(a) If a dispute arises between the Owners in connection with
this statement then either of them may serve on the other Owners written
notice of the dispute following which the provisions of this clause
apply.
(b) The Owners agree that:
i.
they will undertake in good faith to use all reasonable endeavours to
resolve a dispute which arises between them; and
ii.
if the Owners cannot resolve the dispute within 28 days after service of
the notice, the dispute may be submitted for resolution in accordance
with this clause.
11.2 Form of Notice
A dispute notice served under clause 11.1 must:
(a) specify the matter in dispute;
(b) identify the provisions of the Act, this Statement or
other legislation relevant to the dispute;
(c) set out the facts and other circumstances on which the
notice given relies; and,
(d) have attached to it copies of correspondence and other
documents relevant to the dispute.
11.3 Referral of Dispute
(a) If a dispute has not been resolved within the period
referred to in clause 11.1(b)(ii), or such other period as the Owners
may agree then either of the Owners may give written notice to the other
Owners that the dispute is to be referred for resolution by the
Adjudicator in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
(b) The parties agree that the provisions of Part 5 of the Act
apply to any dispute.
11.4 Decision of Adjudicator
(a) A decision of the adjudicator of the Strata Schemes Board
shall be deemed to be a decision of the Building Management Committee.
(b) The Adjudicator and the Strata Schemes Board may exercise
any Function conferred on the Building Management Committee.
I will organise the meeting between Matt and Andrew and if
Andrew does not attend then the meeting will be adjourned as required.
If Andrew does not attend the Adjourned Meeting I will hold a Schedule 3
Meeting with the EC (paper meeting) to issue a Notice of Dispute to
Andrew and application to the CTTT if we cant resolve the issue in the
28 days. Hopefully we will not need to follow this path.
Regards,
Maxine Wickey
Strata Manager
t: (02) 9540 4199
www.stratatitle.com.au <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/>
www.stmplus.com.au <http://www.stmplus.com.au/>
Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
For STM's full disclaimer please visit -
http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
Please only print if necessary.
_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC at 200william.com
http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
--
/* Matt Perkins
Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
Office 1300 133 299 matt at spectrum.com.au
Fax 1300 133 255 Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
SIP 1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au
PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at http://pgp.mit.edu
*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20120906/b9b593fa/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4809 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20120906/b9b593fa/attachment-0001.jpe
More information about the EC
mailing list