<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Good morning,<div><br></div><div>I think a meeting would be appropriate to discuss what it is we really want from amended plans. Realistically the western side of our building is going to be affected whatever modifications are made. It’s important to ensure amendments don’t actually affect us more adversely .<div>Live chat is probably the best solution and probably ASAP.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards</div><div><br></div><div>Paul <br><br><div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 6 Apr 2023, at 11:23 am, cscl@optusnet.com.au wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style>@font-face { font-family: "Cambria Math"; }
@font-face { font-family: Calibri; }
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0cm; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; }
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink { color: rgb(5, 99, 193); text-decoration: underline; }
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph { margin: 0cm 0cm 0cm 36pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; }
span.EmailStyle20 { font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: windowtext; }
.MsoChpDefault { font-size: 10pt; }
@page WordSection1 { size: 612pt 792pt; margin: 72pt; }
div.WordSection1 { page: WordSection1; }
ol { margin-bottom: 0cm; }
ul { margin-bottom: 0cm; }</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal">Good morning,<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Please read the emails below.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">I’ve been in touch with Natalie Richter re the 2<sup>nd</sup> DA for the development between Forbes/Dowling Streets. I’m happy to go ahead (as her work was so detailed the last time) and give my approval. However, we need a General meeting I believe, for a majority approval for her work to go ahead.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Can we organize this asap. Thanks.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Craig<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><a href="mailto:Natalie@natalierichterplanning.com.au">Natalie@natalierichterplanning.com.au</a> wrote<br><br></span><o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Thanks Craig,<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">The last submission was maximum $4,158.00 including GST (which was based on 14 hours work). <span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-AU"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">I would estimate the work to get across the documents, amend the submission would take around the same time. I may be able to organise an abridged type version. To go through the documents will take around 5 hours. I can use the previous submission and the Council ‘issues letter’ as a base for a response to the revisions. <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">So, if it took less time I could charge accordingly at the original hourly rate which was on the terms document sent to Leanne at Strata last year. The objective being to minimise costs for Strata whilst also accommodating the time for this reviewed submission. Let me know how that sounds.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">As before, I charge 50% to start and 50% at the completion.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">We have until May however I will need a bit of lead time.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Thank you and regards. <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Natalie <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> <a href="mailto:cscl@optusnet.com.au">cscl@optusnet.com.au</a> <<a href="mailto:cscl@optusnet.com.au">cscl@optusnet.com.au</a>> <br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, April 6, 2023 5:37 AM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:Natalie@natalierichterplanning.com.au">Natalie@natalierichterplanning.com.au</a><br><b>Subject:</b> RE: Planning Submission for SP 20087- D/2022/139 - 164-172, 174-194 William Street WOOLLOOMOOLOO NSW 2011 - 'Stage 1 concept/envelope proposal' </span><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-fareast-language:EN-AU"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Thank you Natalie. In my email to the others in our committee I would like to state an amount we can expect to be charged by you for all the work. Would you please let me know how much that would be and I will ask them what their wishes are. Again, thank you for the details you’ve sent us after the 2<sup>nd</sup> DA was submitted by the developer.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Cheers,<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Craig<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-fareast-language:EN-AU">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-fareast-language:EN-AU"> Natalie@natalierichterplanning.com.au <Natalie@natalierichterplanning.com.au> <br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, April 5, 2023 4:08 PM<br><b>To:</b> cscl@optusnet.com.au<br><b>Subject:</b> Envelope DA - Bayswater Car Rental - Suggestions<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Hi Craig hope you are well.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">I spoke to Reinah.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">I mentioned the following:<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="1" type="1"><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1">I mentioned that your building does not appear to be included in the view study (and that was requested). She agreed they had expressly asked. She said she would look at that.<o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="2" type="1"><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1">I asked if we can be granted an official 2 additional weeks (on top of the 28 days) to account for getting across the information and to allow people’s current leave times and public holidays. <o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">I have emailed her about it. She will speak to management and respond. She asked if it was for everyone. I said she is likely to have others ask so may be a good idea. She may even do an extended notification period due to the contentious nature. I will let you know the outcome.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="3" type="1"><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1">I asked if she was able to indicate how if at all the revised envelope aligned with Council’s workshopping with the applicant.<o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">She said, they had not given definitive advice however in a general sense they had indicated to the applicant that the design should have regard for the <u>context</u> and be driven by a <u>view study</u> to look at the sharing of views. <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:18.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p><ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="4" type="1"><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1">I indicated the view study was again not ideal. I mentioned the colour coding (showing coloured blocks). She had said that was a suggestion of the Council staff.. (showing the DCP envelope, LEP height and storeys height). I said the green line of the envelope appears to demonstrate that the icons within Harbour and city views would be taken out. As far as properties actually addressed in the study who are also impacted - the green proposed envelope does not appear to seek to <i>share</i> many of those icons. <o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class="MsoListParagraph">My view currently is that the view study does not address Tenacity objectives nor back up why the Council should be considering a variation to a strategic envelope. <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Possible suggestions for responding:<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="1" type="1"><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2">It is very important that you and other interested residents read the revision if they can and make their own personal submissions – if they are comfortable to do so. If it is helpful, I can assist them. Can just be dot points/or whatever detail people want to put in.<o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p><ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="2" type="1"><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2">I was thinking a good way to ‘frame’ responses could be around the original issues letter raised by the Council (the RFI issues/assessment letter that I obtained via GIPA). I could prepare a dot point summary of that for use as a framework of sorts for resident submissions. <o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:36.0pt">Or, I Could also prepare an abridged submission referring to the new version of the envelope re the issues letter provided by Council (as well as highlighting some previous issues). An idea.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p><ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="3" type="1"><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2">We could make another detailed group/strata response. I would be utilising/changing my original work as a base and following the Council RFI matters as well (as above). There would be focus on the bulk and scale/context issue and the view/solar/light impacts. <o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">I have already found a few reasons to object to the revised view assessment. I would think that the budget for my submission would be similar to before as I would need to review all the new documents and assess them (I budgeted for around 14 hours last submission I think in terms of the time allocation). <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">I do understand if this is not an exercise or expense that is wanted to pursue again. Entirely up to you and the Strata as we have said our piece initially. Just depends how detailed you want it. <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">We should certainly be saying that the documents do not address the Council letter requesting that your building views be addressed.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p><ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="4" type="1"><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2">I have spent a bit of time chasing and liaising with owners re this submission. Probably only 1 hour. <o:p></o:p></li></ol><p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoListParagraph">Please let me know how you wish to proceed on this? Please feel free to call if you have any questions or prefer to discuss.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoListParagraph">I would need to get moving on the research quite soon. I will be having a bit of down time late next week and the following week so would be wanting to use time at the beginning of this coming week for this.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Thank you, Natalie <o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-AU">Natalie Richter Planning <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-AU">PO Box 59 Mt Colah NSW 2079<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-AU">m. 0438 828 972<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-AU">This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The contents and attachments are not to be altered or reproduced without our consent or used for any other purpose. If you have received this email in error then please delete the email and inform us of the error by return email. We are not liable for any loss arising from the receipt or use of this email or attachments. It is the responsibility of the receiver to be satisfied that this email and attachments contain no computer viruses.</span><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-AU"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-AU"> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><span>-- </span><br><span>ec mailing list</span><br><span>ec@mailman.perkins.id.au</span><br><span>http://mailman.perkins.id.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ec</span><br></div></blockquote></div></div></body></html>