[200WILLIAM-EC SP67851] Fwd: Draft Submission 2 - for review

Thu May 11 17:51:19 AEST 2023

Thank you. 

I am happy to take it off (bold and so forth) but I do this in case panels in the future skim read (to see quick highlight points) and because it is so lengthy. Good to have feedback so if you want me to tone that down I can. 

Thank you, Natalie 

From: Matthew Perkins - Private <matt at perkins.id.au> 
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:09 PM
To: ec at mailman.perkins.id.au; 'Natalie @ NRP' <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
Subject: Re: [200WILLIAM-EC SP67851] Fwd: Draft Submission 2 - for review

Hi Craig/Natalie,

 That looks very thorougher. From my perspective it's a bit hard on the eyes with all that bold and underlining but I guess that's the point in these cases. Thanks for your work here Natalie it has my approval. 

Kind regards

Matt

On 11/5/2023 3:26 am, Craig Laforest wrote:

Good afternoon, 

I have received the following second complaint draft from Natalie. Please review the doc and if you have any further comments to be included, please email her direct with all EC members included in your email.

Thank you and regards,

Craig

----- Original Message -----

From:

Natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au <mailto:Natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au> 

To:

cscl at optusnet.com.au <mailto:cscl at optusnet.com.au> 

Cc:

"Natalie @ NRP"  <mailto:natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au> <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>

Sent:

Wed, 10 May 2023 10:04:06 +1000

Subject:

Draft Submission 2 - for review

Hi Craig, I hope you are travelling well?

Please find the draft attached. 

Did you want me to send it to others?

This is due Friday if you have a chance to review.

A few things to note:

I have updated discussion to address new documents.

I have put lots of bold and underline to draw attention to key points for any eventual skim readers (eg to remind any panels of highlight issues)

I will be attaching our original view assessment once again, even though they already have it to make the point again about the views not being assessed.

There is a rebranded mixed use (employment focussed) zone as of the other week - so I have updated this and we have a few new handy objectives to rely on there as this is a residentially focussed development.

Thanks and let me know your thoughts when you can.

Regards, Natalie 

Natalie Richter Planning 

PO Box 59 Mt Colah NSW 2079

m. 0438 828 972

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  The contents and attachments are not to be altered or reproduced without our consent or used for any other purpose. If you have received this email in error then please delete the email and inform us of the error by return email.  We are not liable for any loss arising from the receipt or use of this email or attachments. It is the responsibility of the receiver to be satisfied that this email and attachments contain no computer viruses.

  _____  

Email sent using Optus Webmail 

-- 
** DO NOT SEND PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL VIA EMAIL 

Matt Perkins
0403571333
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.perkins.id.au/pipermail/ec/attachments/20230511/7e11761f/attachment.htm>