[200WILLIAM-EC SP67851] Planning Submission for SP 20087- D/2022/139 - 164-172, 174-194 William Street WOOLLOOMOOLOO NSW 2011 - 'Stage 1 concept/envelope proposal'

Fri Mar 31 10:06:00 AEDT 2023

Hi Paul,

  Craig is leading that one. Im sure he can bring you up to date with 
those details.  From my understanding of the plans for vehicle  access 
(from the DA) they will not directly impact us once construction is 
finished as the driveway is going to be in Forbes St. There was talk of 
re-opening the lane that runs through the middle of the property however 
it was going to be a pedestrian only lane so will not help our already I 
think fairly bad traffic to access our building.  Essentially two paths 
from the east which are blocked daily by traffic queues on the ED.

The people from the new building will I guess have to do the same via 
Woolloomooloo or Crown St as we do to come from the east. But wont have 
to queue for William st like we do.  It  will add even more traffic on 
that loop however.  But compared to the ED traffic I guess that's a drop 
in the ocean.  The biggest impact is to view for people on the western 
side.  Which will range from partial changes to total loss.  Again Craig 
did a great job at heading this one up. So I will leave the details to him.

Matt.

On 31/3/2023 7:09 am, Paul Mooney wrote:
> Matt-Matt-Craig,
>
> As a matter of interest can you tell me what it is costing us to 
> retain Natalie and what expenditure was made to photograph and submit 
> initial objection?
>
> I would like a catch up to see what changes we are wanting that will 
> actually lessen the impact.
>
> I see vehicular access as the main issue that seems unclear to me.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 30 Mar 2023, at 8:17 pm, Matthew Perkins - Private 
>> <matt at perkins.id.au> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>> Hi Craig,
>>
>>  Thanks for the update. Arnold is selling the property. So he has no 
>> interest in the development. In any case  i would not discuss it with 
>> Arnold as it does not really concern him also Arnold is not part of 
>> the Residential mailing list  as the BMC list is separate. Im quite 
>> by the book with these sorts of things. In the same way i dont 
>> discuss commercial matters concerning the BMC with residential members.
>>
>>   I guess regarding the site  it's more appropriately called the "No 
>> Birds site"  rather then the No Birds development.  To be clear 
>> Arnold and his brother are not the developer or anything to do with 
>> the new development they are selling the  site to developers I think 
>> they settle very shortly (perhaps already have) from my memory of the 
>> timeline.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30/3/2023 8:02 pm, cscl at optusnet.com.au wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Committee members,
>>>
>>> Please note the latest information from Natalie Richter regarding 
>>> the ”No Birds” development.
>>>
>>> Matt P, please do not include Arnold (the owner of No Birds)  in any 
>>> discussion regarding this update. I know you have a close link with 
>>> him, however, we have appointed Natalie to communication the 
>>> complaints raised on behalf of the Marquis owners. Thank you.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> *From:*Natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au 
>>> <Natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2023 1:30 PM
>>> *To:* cscl at optusnet.com.au
>>> *Subject:* FW: Planning Submission for SP 20087- D/2022/139 - 
>>> 164-172, 174-194 William Street WOOLLOOMOOLOO NSW 2011 - 'Stage 1 
>>> concept/envelope proposal'
>>>
>>> A quick response. FYI we will need to review these when the notes 
>>> come in the mail shortly. You may want to give the others the heads 
>>> up. N
>>>
>>> Hi Natalie,
>>>
>>> You beat me to an email. The applicant has submitted a response to 
>>> the additional information. However, in my initial review of the new 
>>> information, I found that some architectural drawings were missing 
>>> from the package. For efficiency, I have requested for these to be 
>>> provided, prior to me re-notifying the application.
>>>
>>> Once the drawings have been received, I will re-notify the 
>>> application again for 28 days with the same timeframe it was 
>>> initially notified. I am happy to advise when these dates are once I 
>>> receive the drawings. It will be within the next week or so.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Reinah Urqueza
>>>
>>> Senior Planner
>>>
>>> Planning Assessments
>>>
>>> <image001.png>
>>>
>>> Telephone: +612 9265 9140 <tel:+612%209265%209140>
>>>
>>> cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au
>>>
>>> <image002.jpg>
>>>
>>> The City of Sydney acknowledges the Gadigal of the
>>> Eora nation as the Traditional Custodians of our Local
>>> Area.
>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> ** DO NOT SEND PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL VIA EMAIL
>>
>> Matt Perkins
>> 0403571333
>> -- 
>> ec mailing list
>> ec at mailman.perkins.id.au
>> http://mailman.perkins.id.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ec

-- 
** DO NOT SEND PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL VIA EMAIL

Matt Perkins
0403571333
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.perkins.id.au/pipermail/ec/attachments/20230331/c8ee1b89/attachment-0001.htm>