[200William-EC SP67851] New view impact study letter

Matthew Perkins - Private matt at perkins.id.au
Tue Oct 11 09:00:22 AEDT 2022


Hi Craig given that It does sound like the developer.

Matt.


On 11/10/2022 5:49 am, Craig Laforest wrote:
>
> Hello EC,
>
> I didn't contact Daniel Knight and I don't believe we should contact 
> him or any company engaged to take pictures from inside our properties 
> or agree to a drone taking a video.
>
>  We had a complete view impact study done as part of the complaint we 
> lodged through Natalie Richter and included pictures from many of our 
> apartments.  I have included Natalie in this email as it doesn't 
> appear she was included in Matthew Guy's email.
>
> Regards,
> Craig
>
>
>
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From:
>     "Matthew Perkins - Private" <matt at perkins.id.au>
>
>     To:
>     <ec at 200william.com>
>     Cc:
>
>     Sent:
>     Mon, 10 Oct 2022 19:42:00 +1000
>     Subject:
>     Re: [200William-EC SP67851] New view impact study letter
>
>
>     I assume this is from the developer. I dont think it's from us.
>     (unless it's something Craig has done)   Given that are you better
>     off refusing. They have no right to access your premises.  They
>     will be using this to try and prove you are not loosing a view so
>     any photos they take will be edited/sorted in the favor of the
>     developer.  I dont know if it's in our interest to cooperate. The
>     Council asked them to do a view impact study as part of the DA.
>
>     In the end i would say we would need to do our own study that will
>     try and discredit theirs.
>
>     Matt.
>
>
>     On 10/10/2022 7:33 pm, Matthew Guy wrote:
>
>         Hi EC and Natalie,
>
>         I have received a letter from Daniel Knight at Urbaine
>         requesting access to conduct a view impact study for the new
>         development, see below.
>
>         The letter was not addressed and not in an envelope. I am
>         afraid it’s possible many people would have missed it or
>         thought it was junk.
>
>         We definitely need to engage. Is this something we should do
>         as a building or individually?
>
>
>
>         Regards,
>
>         Matthew Guy
>         405
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         EC mailing list
>         EC at 200william.com
>         http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>
>     -- 
>     Matt Perkins
>     0403571333 
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Email sent using Optus Webmail 

-- 
Matt Perkins
0403571333
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20221011/86091946/attachment.html 


More information about the EC mailing list