[200William-EC SP67851] EXT - RE: Terms and Invoice - MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA REPRESENTATION
Matthew Perkins - Private
matt at perkins.id.au
Fri Mar 25 11:03:23 AEDT 2022
There's not need to look at 302 As i said your cant see the development
from my apartment. I would say same for 502, and 602, There might be
minimal impact to 402 as he does not have the wall between the balcony's
like the rest of us do.
Matt.
On 25/3/2022 10:54 am, Marquis wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Just want to confirm some details before I prepare access requests:
>
> Access required to 101, 102, 106, 107, 201, 202, 206, 207, 301, 302,
> 306, 307, 401, 402, 405, 501, 502, 505, 601 & 602. Have I missed anyone?
>
> When do you propose conducting the inspections?
>
> How long do you expect each apartment to take?
>
> Are you able to take some photos from your apartment and mark the
> required details on the attached so we have a clear idea of what will
> be required?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Darren Vignes*
>
> Building Manager
>
>
> *
> Building Facilities Management Solutions*
> 200 William St Woolloomooloo NSW 2011
>
> *M: 0488 388 313
> Email: *marquis at bfms.com.au
> www.bfms.com.au <http://www.bfms.com.au/>__
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> The contents of this e-mail and its attachments are confidential and
> may be subject to legal professional privilege and copyright. It is
> intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail and its
> attachment by anyone else is unauthorised. No representation is
> made that this e-mail or any attachment is free of viruses and other
> defects. Virus scanning is recommended and is the responsibility of
> the recipient. If you are not the intended addressee, any disclosure,
> usage, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it, is prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply
> e-mail and delete this message from your computer.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Craig Laforest <cscl at optusnet.com.au>
> *Sent:* 24 March 2022 15:23
> *To:* 'Natalie @ NRP' <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>; Marquis
> <Marquis at bfms.com.au>; ec at 200william.com <ec at 200william.com>; 'Leanne
> Eardley' <leardley at stratatitle.com.au>
> *Subject:* RE: EXT - RE: Terms and Invoice - MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA
> REPRESENTATION
>
> Thanks Natalie,
>
> Darren, to Natalie’s point re the requested mark ups
> (sitting/standing/room location etc), please let me know how I can get
> this done with you asap as time is short for this submission. Please
> give me a call on 0409 323 585 to put down a plan as we’ll need to
> contact all owners who are affected directly or indirectly. I have
> devoted time to get this done and have an open schedule. Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> *From:*Natalie @ NRP <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
> *Sent:* Thursday, 24 March 2022 12:12 PM
> *To:* 'Marquis' <Marquis at bfms.com.au>; 'Craig Laforest'
> <cscl at optusnet.com.au>; ec at 200william.com; 'Leanne Eardley'
> <leardley at stratatitle.com.au>
> *Subject:* RE: EXT - RE: Terms and Invoice - MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA
> REPRESENTATION
>
> Thanks so much Darren. These plans are good because by printing the
> relevant unit/copy off, the owners could mark up the location of the
> views please.
>
> I may be able to come either early or late next week. May be best to
> go for a day when we don’t have rain (few and far between lately..).
> Thanks for being efficient with these.
>
> Craig are you able to organise the owners to do the requested mark ups
> (sitting/standing/room location etc) based on marking up their units
> (when the rain subsides) please?
>
> Thanks and regards, Natalie
>
> *From:*Marquis <Marquis at bfms.com.au>
> *Sent:* Thursday, 24 March 2022 9:13 AM
> *To:* Natalie @ NRP <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>; 'Craig
> Laforest' <cscl at optusnet.com.au>; ec at 200william.com; 'Leanne Eardley'
> <leardley at stratatitle.com.au>
> *Subject:* Re: EXT - RE: Terms and Invoice - MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA
> REPRESENTATION
>
> Hi Natalie,
>
> We don't have any architectural plans only the attached strata plans.
> Thanks
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Darren Vignes*
>
> Building Manager
>
> *
> Building Facilities Management Solutions*
> 200 William St Woolloomooloo NSW 2011
>
> *M: 0488 388 313
> Email: *marquis at bfms.com.au
> www.bfms.com.au <http://www.bfms.com.au/>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> The contents of this e-mail and its attachments are confidential and
> may be subject to legal professional privilege and copyright. It is
> intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail and its
> attachment by anyone else is unauthorised. No representation is
> made that this e-mail or any attachment is free of viruses and other
> defects. Virus scanning is recommended and is the responsibility of
> the recipient. If you are not the intended addressee, any disclosure,
> usage, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it, is prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply
> e-mail and delete this message from your computer.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*Natalie @ NRP <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
> *Sent:* 23 March 2022 17:14
> *To:* 'Craig Laforest' <cscl at optusnet.com.au>; ec at 200william.com
> <ec at 200william.com>; 'Leanne Eardley' <leardley at stratatitle.com.au>;
> Marquis <marquis at bfms.com.au>
> *Subject:* EXT - RE: Terms and Invoice - MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA
> REPRESENTATION
>
> Thanks Craig and All. If you are able to let me know ASAP if you have
> any architectural plans for your building (doesn’t matter how old) as
> well please?
>
> Thanks and regards, Natalie
>
> *From:*Craig Laforest <cscl at optusnet.com.au>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 23 March 2022 5:08 PM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com; 'Leanne Eardley'
> <leardley at stratatitle.com.au>; 'Darren Vignes' <marquis at bfms.com.au>
> *Cc:* 'Natalie @ NRP' <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
> *Subject:* FW: Terms and Invoice - MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA REPRESENTATION
> *Importance:* High
>
> Dear EC members, Strata Manager (Leanne) and Building Manager (Darren),
>
> Please review the latest email from Natalie Richter below and the
> responses I have made to her in yellow.
>
> Natalie, thank you very much again for your concerns and your
> communications in this matter.
>
> If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me,
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Craig
>
> *From:*Natalie @ NRP <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 23 March 2022 4:30 PM
> *To:* 'Craig Laforest' <cscl at optusnet.com.au>
> *Subject:* Terms and Invoice - MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA REPRESENTATION
> *Importance:* High
>
> Thanks Craig,
>
> Please find attached the Terms/Agreement document and the commencement
> invoice. Thank you.
>
> To answer your question on view assessment.
>
> Please see a link to the Land and Environment Court Planning
> Principles below on how view loss is considered in assessments. Please
> refer mainly to the assessment principles from around Paragraph 25 to
> 29. These are the Principles which all Council’s use in these cases.
>
> Tenacity Consulting v Waringah - NSW Caselaw
> <https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/549f893b3004262463ad0cc6>
>
> *You will see the type of view is important, whether it is
> front/side/oblique. How wide/accessible it is. Whether the view is
> from sitting or standing positions or both. Whether they are from key
> living areas. These aspects are attached to the importance of sharing
> which is where a development needs to or should allow some view
> sharing/equity. These are the aspects we need to consider in our
> photographs. The photographs will also be assessed by Council so need
> to be true to the situation etc (ie not real estate brochures!). WILL
> ENSURE OUR BUILDING MANAGER UNDERSTANDS THESE AND TAKES THE
> PHOTOGRAPHS IN LINE WITH THIS – DARREN PLEASE NOTE*
>
> You will see that the Principles also refer to that a development
> should be compliant with planning controls and expected requirements
> to be ‘reasonable’. I will be discussing all of this in detail.
>
> If residents could please take these sorts of photos, at different
> times of day (as the changing in light is important in our
> presentation. Sometimes different buildings or water are picked up
> more clearly etc).
>
> The best way to tackle views and the assessment with the tight
> timeframe we have is to mark up a floor plan if possible, marking on
> it (for as many units and balconies as possible), where the view
> photos are taken, and whether inside or outside, sitting standing etc.
>
> Floor plans are often with the real estate advertisements for any
> recent sales or does the strata have recent architectural plans? Even
> a sketched up version on an A4 paper could be fine.
>
> I have read the applicants view assessment and your block does not
> seem to be included?
>
> *I can have my drafty look at doing a similar directional aerial and
> possibly indicate the building envelope on it. If you were to have any
> architectural plans at all for your building this would be helpful as
> again, this diagram would need to be at scale and accurate to be the
> best demonstration. With scaled plans of yours, we can then take the
> scale of the other proposed building from the documents and see what
> we can do. If you could look at what you have that would be great. We
> can also look at the DA tracker on 200 William Street to see what is
> there or request the plans (City of Sydney is usually quite quick but
> we would need to do this ASAP IF we don’t have plans on hand). THIS IS
> A GREAT IDEA NATALIE. YES PLEASE HAVE YOUR DRAFTY DO THIS.*
>
> I hope all this makes sense. Please let me know if you have any
> questions at all.
>
> I see from the tracker today that we have until 11 April. I will do
> what I can next week. However, I suggest that you email the officer to
> indicate we are preparing a professional planning submission and that
> we would request an additional few days. I can definitely have it
> finished by the 13^th April. Just allows a bit more time for the work
> which feeds in, the review of the draft and update and so forth.
> Officers are usually fine as long as they have the fixed date. I will
> do the utmost to have it done in time however. If you email a
> submission indicating your initial concerns in point form and your
> strata number and address and indicate that the professional
> submission has been engaged and will follow. *I WILL CONTACT THE
> ASSESSOR IMMEDIATELY REQUESTING EXTRA TIME.*
>
> Thank you and regards, Natalie
>
> Natalie Richter Planning
>
> PO Box 59 Mt Colah NSW 2079
>
> m. 0438 828 972
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. The contents and attachments are not to be altered or
> reproduced without our consent or used for any other purpose. If you
> have received this email in error then please delete the email and
> inform us of the error by return email. We are not liable for any
> loss arising from the receipt or use of this email or attachments. It
> is the responsibility of the receiver to be satisfied that this email
> and attachments contain no computer viruses.
>
> *From:*Craig Laforest <cscl at optusnet.com.au>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 23 March 2022 1:43 PM
> *To:* 'Natalie @ NRP' <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
> *Subject:* RE: MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA REPRESENTATION
>
> Hi Natalie,
>
> Would you please include the strata number 67851 and also the address
> to include “Residents of 200 William Street, Woolloomooloo.”
>
> Looking forward to having all the points we raised bear up against
> this DA as much as possible.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Craig
>
> *From:*Natalie @ NRP <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 23 March 2022 12:17 PM
> *To:* 'Craig Laforest' <cscl at optusnet.com.au>
> *Subject:* RE: MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA REPRESENTATION
>
> Thank you Craig, I can do up those documents now. Did you want me to
> include the Strata number in the invoice or to residents of 200
> William Street?
>
> Thanks, Natalie
>
> *From:*Craig Laforest <cscl at optusnet.com.au>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 23 March 2022 7:43 AM
> *To:* 'Natalie @ NRP' <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
> *Subject:* MARQUIS APARTMENTS DA REPRESENTATION
>
> Dear Natalie,
>
> I have spoken with the Body Corporate and we have agreed that we would
> like to have you represent us. We also agree to the rate.
>
> Would you please organize your invoice on letterhead and send it to me
> asap together with your terms and agreements.
>
> We will have our building manager take the photos you have requested
> from various apartments and email these to you. Would you please
> advise if it is required to take these pictures from inside each
> apartment to show the views which will be lost because of the build?
>
> Please let me know if I can assist any more at this stage.
>
> Thank you and best wishes,
>
> Craig
>
> *From:*Craig Laforest <cscl at optusnet.com.au>
> *Sent:* Monday, 21 March 2022 12:14 PM
> *To:* 'Natalie @ NRP' <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
> *Cc:* 'ec at 200william.com' <ec at 200william.com>
> *Subject:* RE: DA View Issues
>
> Hello Natalie,
>
> I’ve just spoken with Reina Urqueza at City of Sydney. Good news is
> that they’re only in the ‘initial stages’ of the DA and she will be
> asking in the report to the owners of the land for information
> relating to view impact of surrounding buildings. She has also asked
> me to obtain photos of the present views of the site from our AVIS
> building and submit those to her.
>
> Please let me know when you can, what your fee would be to help us
> fight this DA.
>
> Again, I appreciate the information you have provided already.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Craig
>
> *From:*Natalie @ NRP <natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au
> <mailto:natalie at natalierichterplanning.com.au>>
> *Sent:* Monday, 21 March 2022 10:52 AM
> *To:* 'Craig Laforest' <cscl at optusnet.com.au
> <mailto:cscl at optusnet.com.au>>
> *Subject:* DA View Issues
>
> Hi Craig.
>
> Since speaking I have had a look on the tracker and can not see the
> referenced view assessment. I am a little concerned about this. I have
> checked twice.
>
> The submitted ‘Statement of Environmental Effects’ says the following:
>
> /5.3.1. View Sharing /
>
> /Richard Lamb and Associates have undertaken an Assessment of
> Potential Impacts on View Sharing which provides an assessment of
> potential impacts on private domain views because of the development.
> This assessment has been informed by a review of architectural plans,
> field work observations and an analysis of CGIs prepared by FJMT. The
> built form facing the site on the south side of William Street is
> predominantly retail and commercial. However, there are a small number
> of residential properties that could be affected by view loss,
> predominantly Horizon, Top of the Town, 5 Farrell Avenue, 26 Kirkton
> Road, 1 Tewkesbury Avenue, Harbourview at 12-20 Rosebank Street and
> 1-5 Rosebank Street have been considered with regard to potential view
> loss. The view assessment concludes that: ▪ Overall the proposal would
> not cause any impacts on view sharing for the majority of residential
> buildings in the vicinity, including buildings south-east and east of
> the site such as Top of the Town, Elan, Altair, Zenith and Omnia. ▪ As
> would be anticipated by implementation of the existing development
> controls for the site, a complying building envelope would cause view
> loss for some levels of residential buildings south and south-east of
> the site such as Horizon, 5 Farrell Avenue the associated buildings at
> 26 Kirketon Road and 1 Tewkesbury Avenue. These buildings would be
> likely to retain extensive and unaffected views from the levels
> affected, ensuring that view sharing would be achieved. URBIS
> STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS - 164-194 WILLIAM STREET,
> WOOLLOOMOOLOO 41 /
>
> /▪ View loss, as is anticipated by implementation of the development
> controls, would occur for buildings with views from residential levels
> that are lower than that of a permissible envelope and as a result
> there would be some view sharing impacts produced by the proposal.
> This includes buildings such as Harbourview and 1-5 Rosebank Street,
> from which it would be unreasonable to expect existing views to be
> retained, when the controls contemplate a building significantly
> higher than the existing buildings on the site and adjacent sites,
> including the Avis car rental building at 200 William Street. ▪ The
> proposed building envelope complies with the standard for height of
> buildings and responds to the crossfalls of the site from east to west
> on William Street and the falls from William Street toward the north.
> Where there is view loss, this would generally occur up to Level 5 to
> 7 for the buildings considered. Notwithstanding there would be some
> view loss caused by the proposed building, the extent of impact is
> within the reasonable expectations of implementation of the
> development standards and controls. It is therefore shown that the
> proposal can be supported on view sharing grounds./
>
> //
>
> I believe that we should contact the assessment officer and ask where
> this report is as I believe it would have been appropriate for this to
> have been included given the potential impacts. Do you want to make a
> call to Council?
>
> Normally, a view impact assessment would provide sight lines across
> from impacted buildings and the 3d diagrams such as the following
> might be used to show the building in relation to view trajectories.
>
> It may be worthwhile seeking our own professional view analysis. I
> know of another very good consultant. It really depends on the budget.
> I could see if she is still working and see what a budget could be for
> this to feed into mine. I would need to gather information quickly on
> how many buildings are impacted in terms of view.
>
> I have also noticed that the attached Architectural design study is
> relatively silent on this issue which it should not be in my view when
> seeking ‘extras’.
>
> Please let me know how you go with the Council. The contact is *
> Make a submission to Council Officer*Reinah Urqueza
> <https://online2.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/DA/IndividualApplication?tpklapappl=1609096>
>
> I will email later with a fee. However if you could have a think about
> how many buildings may be impacted this may help. They may be getting
> their own planners perhaps.
>
> Speak soon and regards, Natalie
>
> Natalie Richter Planning
>
> PO Box 59 Mt Colah NSW 2079
>
> m. 0438 828 972
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. The contents and attachments are not to be altered or
> reproduced without our consent or used for any other purpose. If you
> have received this email in error then please delete the email and
> inform us of the error by return email. We are not liable for any
> loss arising from the receipt or use of this email or attachments. It
> is the responsibility of the receiver to be satisfied that this email
> and attachments contain no computer viruses.
>
> *From:*Craig Laforest <cscl at optusnet.com.au
> <mailto:cscl at optusnet.com.au>>
> *Sent:* Friday, 18 March 2022 4:40 PM
> *To:* info at natalierichterplanning.com.au
> <mailto:info at natalierichterplanning.com.au>
> *Subject:* A PROGRAM ON HOW TO HAVE A DA FOUGHT AND WON
>
> Dear Natalie,
>
> Thank you for your text.
>
> I live at 200 William Street, Woolloomooloo in the AVIS building and
> am a member of the residential Body Corporate.
>
> Last week it was announced that the buildings which make up 166-194
> William Street would be pulled down and an apartment block would be
> put up in its place, comprising 220 apartments.
>
> Some of the owners in our building are not in favour of losing
> sunshine from this building, an increase in the already extremely
> heavy traffic on William Street surrounding roads/streets and in some
> cases, the views.
>
> I asked the Potts Pointers group on Facebook if there was anyone who
> could be recommended to take up the fight against the DA on our
> behalf. Your name was given by Drew Wentzel. I mentioned in a post
> on Facebook “Outlined below are several important points re the DA.
> The DA does not show the traffic problems that William Street is going
> to face for the present owners in this immediate area and any of the
> new owners of the apartments from this new apartment site. The DA
> proposes using an outlet such as Corfu Lane in addition to narrow
> McElhone and Cathedral streets as ways for people to drive onto
> William Street and to the Eastern Distributor. If you are travelling
> from the eastern suburbs to get to the site, this is also the major
> option to get into Forbes Street (where the entry to parking will be
> for the new build);. The only other option is to go down to busy Crown
> Street using back roads and turn right onto William Street (to get to
> Forbes). My other major concern is that we are going to lose yet more
> sunshine from a really beautiful area overlooking the disaster of
> William Street and its constant throng of traffic. To put in 229
> apartments is absolutely ridiculous given the traffic situation we
> have and again yet another way to continually build high and then in a
> few years’ time look back and say....'why did they decide to take away
> the sunshine yet again?' I have asked on PPers for a specialist who
> may help us fight this DA. Any recommendations would be appreciated.”
>
> Below is the article which came out in the Sydney Morning Herald.
> Click on the picture of the building for full details:
>
> https://m.facebook.com/groups/PottsPointers/permalink/3939889962903059/
> <https://m.facebook.com/groups/PottsPointers/permalink/3939889962903059/>
>
> If this is an area you are qualified in and if you have the same
> concerns we have, would you kindly provide me with a quote and details
> of how you would go about working on our behalf.
>
> My phone number, again, is 0409 323 585.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible. Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Craig Laforest
>
> s
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
--
Matt Perkins
0403571333
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20220325/4ba2e169/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 6AEA9EA0-5508-4A21-BCA7-1AD37ACA279E_1_105_c.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 208876 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20220325/4ba2e169/attachment-0001.jpeg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook-faengcsj.png
Type: image/png
Size: 24383 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20220325/4ba2e169/attachment-0002.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 24383 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20220325/4ba2e169/attachment-0003.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 120850 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20220325/4ba2e169/attachment-0001.jpg
More information about the EC
mailing list