[200William-EC SP67851] Fwd: RE: DP 1040255 - Reconvened Annual BMC Meeting & Building Management Fees

Matt Perkins matt at spectrum.com.au
Mon Aug 1 16:51:03 AEST 2016 

Hi All,

I received this response from Andrew regarding the paying back of money. 
It's my option that he is asking us here if we want to negotiate a 
price. Brook. I think you are best qualified to respond to this issue.  
Im not a solicitor.

Patrick has said to me previously he can not offer any advice. We seem 
to be on our own here gain.  Please instruct me how to continue with 
Andrew.

Matt.



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	RE: DP 1040255 - Reconvened Annual BMC Meeting & Building 
Management Fees
Date: 	Mon, 1 Aug 2016 06:44:04 +0000
From: 	Andrew Veron <av at charlesstuart.com.au>
To: 	Matt Perkins <matt at spectrum.com.au>



Thank you for the response.

The fact that the Building Manager from the Residential fails to 
understand the areas of responsibility is not the fault of the 
commercial. This issue has been on the tabled for years.

On your response I need to ask for direction from my client, their 
response is not one I think will benefit anyone or the buildings values.

It would be far better to avoid that if possible. Is there another 
alternative other than me delivering a flat NO?

Regards

Andrew Veron
0418 225 345

Description: Charles & Stuart

Charles Stuart Suite 3, Level 1
23-25 Bay Street Double Bay NSW 2028
Tel 02 9327 6444 Fax 02 9326 2740
www.charlesstuart.com.au

This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
must not disclose or use the information contained within.
If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately 
by return email and delete the document.

*From:*Matt Perkins [mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au]
*Sent:* Monday, 1 August 2016 4:33 PM
*To:* Patrick Rush; Andrew Veron
*Cc:* Ben Mees; ec at 200william.com; 'marquis at bmfs.com.au'
*Subject:* Re: DP 1040255 - Reconvened Annual BMC Meeting & Building 
Management Fees

My discussions of late have indicated that we will not be paying back 
the $29,575 It's our belief that the commercial strata used (and 
continue to use) the residential building manager.  As recent as last 
Friday our manager was contacted regarding damage to the level G toilet. 
The log from the residential building manager clearly states lots of 
work done for the commercial  strata during the period the commercial 
strata wants paid back.

It's the EC's position that as the residential building manager  has  
been conducting work for the Commercial tenants throughout the period in 
question the residential strata will not be paying it back.


Matt




On 1/08/2016 3:29 PM, Patrick Rush wrote:

    Dear Andrew & Matt,

    Apologies for the delay in responding to you in relation to what
    would be required to proceed with the adjourned Annual BMC Meeting.

    Below are the figures that relate back to December 2011 for the
    Building Management Fees paid by the BMC to BFMS.

    The total payments made were $163,821.67 including GST. The payments
    from October 2015 have already been paid back to SP 67851 as this
    was when the new contract was entered into with BFMS and SP 678751
    only. These payments total $18,643.65 including GST.

    This means the remaining $145,718.02 including GST was paid directly
    form the BMC Trust Account. The Residential (SP 67851) paid
    $116,142.42 including GST & Commercial (SP 6785) paid $29,575.60
    including GST of this amount as per the costs shares detail in the
    SMS for Marquis.

    As, In understand Andrew, you believe that the $29,575.60 including
    GST should be paid back to the Owners SP 67850 from The Owners SP
    67851’s Trust Account. Can you confirm this is correct?

    If this is the case, Matt can you confirm that you would like to
    organise a Committee Meeting to discuss this request and seek
    direction for the Adjourned Annual BMC Meeting to proceed with an
    understanding if the above matter is going to be resolved?

    Kind regards,

    *Patrick Rush*

    Strata Manager

    Phone:(02) 9266 2600 | Email:prush at stratatitle.com.au
    <mailto:northshore at stratatitle.com.au> | Address:PO Box 2727, Taren
    Point, NSW 2229

    **

    cid:BEA4112D-982D-40A7-9E7A-95F7B76E7ACE at fritz.box
    <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/>cid:C9038DE0-22F0-48A5-82C9-2AAA48233316 at fritz.box
    <http://www.facebook.com/StrataTitleManagement>cid:E179D377-28C0-4C30-A8C6-AEA7CFCA04E5 at fritz.box<http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm>cid:1950DB4B-6066-468B-8AD1-875EFBC4D48C at fritz.box
    <http://www.twitter.com/STMStrata>pinterest.png
    <http://www.pinterest.com/STMStrata>google_plus.png
    <http://plus.google.com/+StrataTitleManagemenSydney>

    **

    *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*

    STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this
    email when relating to a client matter.

    Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our
    website –www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
    <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/>

    *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
    including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained
    on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by
    owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective
    purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As
    such author discretion is advised.

-- 

/* Matt Perkins

         Direct 1300 137 379        Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.

         Office 1300 133 299matt at spectrum.com.au <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>  

                                    Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000

         Spectrum Networks is a member of the Communications Alliance & TIO

*/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20160801/0de0dfa5/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6746 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20160801/0de0dfa5/attachment-0001.jpe 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 17026 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20160801/0de0dfa5/attachment-0006.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 4236 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20160801/0de0dfa5/attachment-0007.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 3977 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20160801/0de0dfa5/attachment-0008.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 4502 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20160801/0de0dfa5/attachment-0009.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1473 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20160801/0de0dfa5/attachment-0010.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1732 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20160801/0de0dfa5/attachment-0011.png

More information about the EC mailing list