[200William-EC SP67851] AGM - SP67851

[Brook Beves]

Good work Pia and I agree with your agenda including the proposed new By Law.
Over to Ed to scrutinise the financials
Many thanks
Brook

Sent from my iPhone

> On 14 Apr 2015, at 4:22 pm, Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Matt,
> 
> I can fiddle around with it and change it as you suggest to allow us to bill an owner for costs incurred when findings are in the owners corporations favor and the action was brought by the owner?
> 
> Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
> 
> Have a nice day,
> 
> Kind regards,
> Pia Cunningham
> Strata Manager
> BMC Manager and
> Company Title Manager
> 
> Phone: (02) 9266 2600 | Email: pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au | Address: PO Box 72, STRAWBERRY HILLS NSW 2012, Level 7, 447 Kent Street, SYDNEY  NSW  2000
> 
> 
> 
> Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
> STM Limited takes no responsibility for content included in this email when relating to a client matter.
> Please view Vesture’s full email communication disclaimer on our website – www.stratatitle.com.au/disclaimer/
> 
> 
> 
> Important Notice:  Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Perkins [mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 4:21 PM
> To: Pia Cunningham; ec at 200william.com
> Subject: Re: [200William-EC SP67851] AGM - SP67851
> 
> I like where your going with this one Pia, But I dont think I would vote for it. I know in our situation it would be handy. But Im a bit of a lefty so Im not fond of the idea of OC being able to take action toward you at every turn and then charging you for the privilege.
> 
> I think the cost of action to the OC is a deterrent to the OC taking frivolous action toward an owner.  A situation could occur where a hostile EC could simply make unfounded claims about noise for example and screw over an owner.
> 
> I dont know what everyone else thinks as I said im a bit of a lefty. Im happy to have it go on the agenda if everyone else wants it. Im not likely to vote for it.
> 
> Now if there was a bylaw that would allow us to bill an owner for costs incurred when findings were in the EC's favor and the action was brought by the owner. That I wouild go for.
> 
> Matt.
> 
> 
>  On 14/04/2015 4:06 pm, P