[200William-EC SP67851] Vote on pet by law at EGM was MISCALCULATED and badly handled. It should have been passed
Barney Kitay
barnet at kitays.com
Mon Nov 24 16:03:28 EST 2014
Will do.
Thanks Matt.
Kind regards
Barney
0400 200 446
Please excuse brevity. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------
From: Matt Perkins <matt at spectrum.com.au>
Date:24/11/2014 15:46 (GMT+10:00)
To: ec at 200william.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: [200William-EC SP67851] Vote on pet by law at EGM was MISCALCULATED and badly handled. It should have been passed
Hi All,
Thanks for agreeing at short notice. At 6.30 PM could you please call
into the conference as follows.
At 6:30PM
Call 1800234576
When prompted key in conference number 0289168101
Should be able to kick this over in 20 minutes.
Thanks
Matt.
On 24/11/2014 12:22 pm, Matt Perkins wrote:
> Im not sure if Barny and Brook check there email's regularly. Perhaps
> we might need to give them a call to ask if they are available.
>
> Matt
>
>
> On 24/11/2014 12:09 pm, Dave Petschack wrote:
>> Good idea Matt.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 24/11/2014, at 12:07 PM, Matt Perkins wrote:
>>
>>> So this all doesn't drag on forever. Would everyone be able to have
>>> a quick teleconference today or tomorrow to give Pia some
>>> instructions to being the schedule 3 meeting process. We could have
>>> this done very quickly if we are all on the same page and return the
>>> paperwork.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt.
>>>
>>>> Hi Pia,
>>>>
>>>> Obviously Di is very upset that the vote didn't go the way she
>>>> would have wished.
>>>> I know you had a colleague there on the night checking the vote,
>>>> however the minutes only state that the motion failed.
>>>>
>>>> To help appease Di can you please circulate the final vote number
>>>> for and against.
>>>>
>>>> Moving forward, can you advise how quickly we can have the amended
>>>> by-law (as per Matts suggestion) Motion 3 happening?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for you assistance Pia.
>>>>
>>>> Regards Dave
>>>>
>>>> <Mail Attachment.jpeg>
>>>>
>>>> On 24/11/2014, at 11:00 AM, Pia Cunningham wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> The minutes were circulated, thanks for resending Matt.
>>>>>
>>>>> Diana, I didn't fob you off, I spoke to you outside the meeting
>>>>> and gave you the vote and had to leave as we had another meeting
>>>>> starting.
>>>>>
>>>>> I send a schedule 3 vote around to the committee the next day to
>>>>> call the EGM but only received two responses to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not
>>>>> hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>> **
>>>>> *Pia Cunningham*
>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>
>>>>> /STM RGB.jpg/
>>>>> //
>>>>> facebook_logo[1].png
>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>twitter-bird-blue-on-white.png
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag>LinkedIn-Logo.png
>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home>STM
>>>>> Stratasphere_ICON.jpg <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>
>>>>> //
>>>>> *t:* (02) 9266 2600 <tel:%2802%29%209266%202600>
>>>>> *www.stratatitle.com.au <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/>*
>>>>> *www.stmplus.com.au <http://www.stmplus.com.au/>*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>>>>> For STM's full disclaimer please visit
>>>>> --http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>>>
>>>>> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all
>>>>> correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and
>>>>> emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject
>>>>> to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well
>>>>> as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within
>>>>> your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tile2014_YoungStrataManager_HighCom_S
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Nov 2014, at 2:03 pm, Dave Petschack <dave at robadda.com
>>>>> <mailto:dave at robadda.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Matt,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The minutes don't record the vote result.
>>>>>> Once Pia circulates that it will help palace Di.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <ROB19732_DaveEmailSig.jpg>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23/11/2014, at 1:57 PM, Matt Perkins wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>> Pia Did send minutes. See attached.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23/11/2014 1:53 pm, Dave Petschack wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I concur with Matt and Brook - from memory the voting was 51 to
>>>>>>>> 49, very close.
>>>>>>>> We left the meeting agreeing to put it back to another paper
>>>>>>>> vote. A paper vote is likely to go through as attendance at the
>>>>>>>> meeting is not required.
>>>>>>>> Good idea to get Pia to do a double check and circulate the
>>>>>>>> minutes of the meeting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Di was understandably upset that he vote did not go through -
>>>>>>>> but it was done fair and square.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <Mail Attachment.jpeg>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23/11/2014, at 9:24 AM, Rob Willett wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OK, all good, lets get Pia to do a recount of the entitlements
>>>>>>>>> and the matter will be resolved. I will follow her up on
>>>>>>>>> Monday morning.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <ROB19732_RobEmailSig.jpg>
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 22 Nov 2014, at 11:43 pm, Brook Beves
>>>>>>>>> <brookbeves at bigpond.com <mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Rob and all
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matt is correct. It is a vote of those present or by proxy
>>>>>>>>>> and whilst I did have Andrews proxy it had not been signed off.
>>>>>>>>>> Rowan was present and entitled to vote on the motion contrary
>>>>>>>>>> to Di's assertion.
>>>>>>>>>> If there has been a miscalculation it can easily be corrected
>>>>>>>>>> and an amended minutes provided.
>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps Pia could check her notes and calculations.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Brook
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/11/2014, at 8:06 AM, Matt Perkins <matt at spectrum.com.au
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>>>>>>>> it wasn't bungled. it was voted down. it's not a vote of
>>>>>>>>>>> the Ec its a vote of the every owner. that is its like an
>>>>>>>>>>> AGM. everyone can vote and its on entitlement units not
>>>>>>>>>>> majority. if the calculation of entitlement units is wrong
>>>>>>>>>>> it could be simply changed and passed. I have no reason to
>>>>>>>>>>> think they were. we could calculate it again I will go over
>>>>>>>>>>> my notes. Andrews vote was not counted as brook did not
>>>>>>>>>>> excite the proxy correctly and Di is not calculating
>>>>>>>>>>> entitlement units correctly it has to be done using the
>>>>>>>>>>> table in the strata plan. which pia did on the night.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Di is manipulating the situation to get a better price. She
>>>>>>>>>>> stated that she had a buyer once the pet bylaw went through.
>>>>>>>>>>> however before the vote she put her home up for auction.
>>>>>>>>>>> strange action for someone with a buyer.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> then at the meeting she stated that Rowan's partner should
>>>>>>>>>>> seek therapy for phobia of dogs. when he made a legitimate
>>>>>>>>>>> point about him choosing the building because it was not pet
>>>>>>>>>>> friendly and would move if it were changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> as I stated after the meeting once the bylaw is amended with
>>>>>>>>>>> some safeguards for people that are anxious or allergic to
>>>>>>>>>>> dogs I will vote in favor of it. Pia has stated that can be
>>>>>>>>>>> done on a paper meeting egm. at the same time as the
>>>>>>>>>>> addition of the special levy for the building renovation.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am happy to put the amendments in a draft bylaw and have
>>>>>>>>>>> made a start on it but my sons has been sick and in hospital
>>>>>>>>>>> so I have been a bit flat out. things should slow down their
>>>>>>>>>>> and at work next week and I will give it another crack.
>>>>>>>>>>> this whole thing could be resolved in a few weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> please excuse the typing abruptness hastily done on the
>>>>>>>>>>> phone....
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> matt
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23 Nov 2014, at 12:14 am, Rob Willett <rob at robadda.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rob at robadda.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Could I please have your feedback on this. Obviously this
>>>>>>>>>>>> is a very stressful situation for Di. I would appreciate it
>>>>>>>>>>>> I could get your out-take of the situation and then make a
>>>>>>>>>>>> plan of action. Preferably over the next 24 hours if possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It was mentioned that Rowan voted against. As Rowan is not
>>>>>>>>>>>> a member, this year, of the EC, is the vote then that was
>>>>>>>>>>>> taken at the last meeting, illegitimate? I don't know,
>>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps Matt or Brook who are much more familiar with
>>>>>>>>>>>> bi-laws might know?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, ROB
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ROB19732_RobEmailSig.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 Nov 2014, at 2:02 pm, Diana Dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>> <didee.cd at gmail.com <mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date:* 22 November 2014 4:00:45 am GMT-8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* Philip Quirk <phil at philipquirk.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:phil at philipquirk.com>>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penny.timothy at raywhite.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:penny.timothy at raywhite.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* *Fwd: Vote on pet by law at EGM was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MISCALCULATED and badly handled. It should have been passed*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I asked you for details of the vote, you brushed me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off with 'from memory it was very close' ... that was not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good enough, and you NEVER got back to me with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> details which I asked for. You did give me enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information to work it out for myself though. You said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there were 8 unit entitlements who voted; seven of those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had 2 votes and I had 3, a total of 17. Two voted against
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the motion, meaning that there were 13 for and 4 against.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13/17 = 76.5%.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expect recompense for the harm done to my marketing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> campaign. A revised ad before auction which could now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include 'pet-friendly building' would be a start. We do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not expect strata title management to make mistakes such
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as this especially when I asked several times for an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explanation and never got it. This is very hard for me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as I am in Canada and find, that due to lack of simple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mathematical skills, something that should have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoothly passed has been bungled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I won't be back until December 1st but I expect you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call my partner Philip Quirk on 0412641479 and explain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what you are going to do and I expect to hear from you on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monday 24th.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date:* 22 November 2014 3:12:54 am GMT-8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Philip Quirk <phil at philipquirk.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:phil at philipquirk.com>>, Brook Beves
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <brookbeves at bigpond.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com>>, Andrew James EC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marquis <Andrew.James at lifehouserpa.org.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Andrew.James at lifehouserpa.org.au>>, Edward
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sainsbury Marquis <edsainsbury at ozemail.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:edsainsbury at ozemail.com.au>>, Dave Petschack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dave at oneforall.com.au <mailto:dave at oneforall.com.au>>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "cquinlan at stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:cquinlan at stratatitle.com.au> "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <cquinlan at stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:cquinlan at stratatitle.com.au>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* *Fwd: Vote on pet by law at EGM was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MISCALCULATED and badly handled. It should have been passed*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date:* 22 November 2014 3:08:09 am GMT-8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Rob Willett <rob at robadda.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rob at robadda.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* *Vote on pet by law at EGM was MISCALCULATED
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and badly handled. It should have been passed*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 Nov 2014, at 3:01 am, Diana Dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <didee.cd at gmail.com <mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi rob,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am extremely annoyed at the lack of transparency in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the vote on the pet by law. There had to be 75% in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> favour. Eight owners voted. Six voted for and two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against. See below. This has seriously harmed my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marketing plan. I don't think the result was correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Di
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date:* 22 November 2014 2:57:06 am GMT-8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* Philip Quirk <phil at philipquirk.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:phil at philipquirk.com>>, Brook Beves
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <brookbeves at bigpond.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com>>, Andrew James EC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marquis <Andrew.James at lifehouserpa.org.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Andrew.James at lifehouserpa.org.au>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* *Re: date for EGM for Marquis 200 William
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St 2011*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry to keep asking you about the details of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the vote on the pet bylaw where there had to be 75%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in favour, but as there were 8 owners voting and two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted against the motion, that would mean that there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were four votes against and 13 votes in favour.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13/17 is 76.5%. I had 3 votes and all the others had 2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can not see how this bylaw was not passed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate a quick answer to this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13 Nov 2014, at 4:25 pm, Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Diana,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All owners were sent the agenda and had the option
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The legislation states that when voting on a special
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolution, no more than 25% of those voting are to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be against the motion in order for it to pass. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't happen. It was very close and from memory (I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am currently off work) there were 8 unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitlements in the vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only way for this to be recited on is to have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another general meeting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please do not hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pia Cunningham*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /STM RGB.jpg/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> facebook_logo[1].png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>twitter-bird-blue-on-white.png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag>LinkedIn-Logo.png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home>STM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stratasphere_ICON.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *t:* (02) 9266 2600 <tel:%2802%29%209266%202600>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *www.stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *www.stmplus.com.au <http://www.stmplus.com.au/>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For STM's full disclaimer please visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correspondence, including letters, facsimile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmissions and emails are retained on the file of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your scheme and may be subject to inspection by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owners and residents within your scheme, as well as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sale within your scheme. As such author discretion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tile2014_YoungStrataManager_HighCom_S
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 Nov 2014, at 3:56 am, Diana Dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <didee.cd at gmail.com <mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was very disappointed that the pet bylaw did not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get passed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would enhance the value of the building. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manner in which the result was calculated was not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at all transparent, and then you said it was very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close. I would like to know exactly what happened
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please and how it was calculated. Many owners did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not vote and if they were given a heads up the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> result could well be different. Brook Beves who was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in favour of it may have been misunderstood. How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many proxies were sent?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Many prospective buyers of my apartment are older
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people downSizing from a house and many have a pet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While I understand that by law you simply cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop anyone from having a companion animal in their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> home whatever the bylaws may say, naturally no one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wants to buy into a building where they are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officially approved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You did say you would get back to me about this,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but you haven't and I would really appreciate it if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would do so. Thank you and warm regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana Dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16 Oct 2014, at 11:21 am, Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good Morning Diana,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The agenda has been sent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please see attached scanned copy of the agenda.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please do not hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pia Cunningham*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /<image012.jpg>/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image013.png>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212><image014.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag><image015.png> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home><image016.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *t:*(02) 9266 2600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *www.stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *www.stmplus.com.au <http://www.stmplus.com.au/>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For STM's full disclaimer please visit --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all correspondence, including letters, facsimile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmissions and emails are retained on the file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owners and residents within your scheme, as well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for sale within your scheme. As such author
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discretion is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image011.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:*Diana Dennison [mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 16 October 2014 10:51 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: date for EGM for Marquis 200
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> William St 2011
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you mind forwarding the wording on the pet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clause you drafted for another property that will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be brought up at our EGM on the 29th? I trust the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notices went out yesterday??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana Dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 October 2014 07:37, Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are more than welcome!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please do not hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pia Cunningham*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *t:*_(02) 9266
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2600_<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *_www.stratatitle.com.au_*<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *_www.stmplus.com.au_*<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Emailed Communication / Documents
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Disclaimer*<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For STM's full disclaimer please visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --_http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp_<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all correspondence, including letters, facsimile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmissions and emails are retained on the file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owners and residents within your scheme, as well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for sale within your scheme. As such author
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discretion is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advised.<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Oct 2014, at 7:31 am, Diana Dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <_didee.cd at gmail.com_>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia,<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great, and thank you very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much.<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards,<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 October 2014 07:24, Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <_pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au_>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana,<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is correct. I understand that it's almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three weeks away, but we require two weeks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notice for the meeting and I have other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meetings scheduled for the Monday and Tuesday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The agenda will be sent no later than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wednesday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above, please do not hesitate to contact
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> day,<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cunningham*<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manager<http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20141124/52b0a4c4/attachment-0001.html
More information about the EC
mailing list