[200William-EC SP67851] Vote on pet by law at EGM was MISCALCULATED and badly handled. It should have been passed
Dave Petschack
dave at robadda.com
Sun Nov 23 14:03:04 EST 2014
Thanks Matt,
The minutes don't record the vote result.
Once Pia circulates that it will help palace Di.
Dave
On 23/11/2014, at 1:57 PM, Matt Perkins wrote:
> Hi All,
> Pia Did send minutes. See attached.
>
> Matt.
>
>
> On 23/11/2014 1:53 pm, Dave Petschack wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> I concur with Matt and Brook - from memory the voting was 51 to 49, very close.
>> We left the meeting agreeing to put it back to another paper vote. A paper vote is likely to go through as attendance at the meeting is not required.
>> Good idea to get Pia to do a double check and circulate the minutes of the meeting.
>>
>> Di was understandably upset that he vote did not go through - but it was done fair and square.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <Mail Attachment.jpeg>
>>
>> On 23/11/2014, at 9:24 AM, Rob Willett wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> OK, all good, lets get Pia to do a recount of the entitlements and the matter will be resolved. I will follow her up on Monday morning.
>>>
>>>
>>> <ROB19732_RobEmailSig.jpg>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 Nov 2014, at 11:43 pm, Brook Beves <brookbeves at bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rob and all
>>>>
>>>> Matt is correct. It is a vote of those present or by proxy and whilst I did have Andrews proxy it had not been signed off.
>>>> Rowan was present and entitled to vote on the motion contrary to Di's assertion.
>>>> If there has been a miscalculation it can easily be corrected and an amended minutes provided.
>>>> Perhaps Pia could check her notes and calculations.
>>>>
>>>> Brook
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On 23/11/2014, at 8:06 AM, Matt Perkins <matt at spectrum.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>> it wasn't bungled. it was voted down. it's not a vote of the Ec its a vote of the every owner. that is its like an AGM. everyone can vote and its on entitlement units not majority. if the calculation of entitlement units is wrong it could be simply changed and passed. I have no reason to think they were. we could calculate it again I will go over my notes. Andrews vote was not counted as brook did not excite the proxy correctly and Di is not calculating entitlement units correctly it has to be done using the table in the strata plan. which pia did on the night.
>>>>>
>>>>> Di is manipulating the situation to get a better price. She stated that she had a buyer once the pet bylaw went through. however before the vote she put her home up for auction. strange action for someone with a buyer.
>>>>>
>>>>> then at the meeting she stated that Rowan's partner should seek therapy for phobia of dogs. when he made a legitimate point about him choosing the building because it was not pet friendly and would move if it were changed.
>>>>>
>>>>> as I stated after the meeting once the bylaw is amended with some safeguards for people that are anxious or allergic to dogs I will vote in favor of it. Pia has stated that can be done on a paper meeting egm. at the same time as the addition of the special levy for the building renovation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am happy to put the amendments in a draft bylaw and have made a start on it but my sons has been sick and in hospital so I have been a bit flat out. things should slow down their and at work next week and I will give it another crack. this whole thing could be resolved in a few weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>> please excuse the typing abruptness hastily done on the phone....
>>>>>
>>>>> matt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Nov 2014, at 12:14 am, Rob Willett <rob at robadda.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could I please have your feedback on this. Obviously this is a very stressful situation for Di. I would appreciate it I could get your out-take of the situation and then make a plan of action. Preferably over the next 24 hours if possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was mentioned that Rowan voted against. As Rowan is not a member, this year, of the EC, is the vote then that was taken at the last meeting, illegitimate? I don’t know, perhaps Matt or Brook who are much more familiar with bi-laws might know?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, ROB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <ROB19732_RobEmailSig.jpg>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22 Nov 2014, at 2:02 pm, Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> Date: 22 November 2014 4:00:45 am GMT-8
>>>>>>>> To: Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au>
>>>>>>>> Cc: Philip Quirk <phil at philipquirk.com>, penny.timothy at raywhite.com.au
>>>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Vote on pet by law at EGM was MISCALCULATED and badly handled. It should have been passed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pia,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When I asked you for details of the vote, you brushed me off with 'from memory it was very close' ... that was not good enough, and you NEVER got back to me with the details which I asked for. You did give me enough information to work it out for myself though. You said there were 8 unit entitlements who voted; seven of those had 2 votes and I had 3, a total of 17. Two voted against the motion, meaning that there were 13 for and 4 against. 13/17 = 76.5%.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I expect recompense for the harm done to my marketing campaign. A revised ad before auction which could now include 'pet-friendly building' would be a start. We do not expect strata title management to make mistakes such as this especially when I asked several times for an explanation and never got it. This is very hard for me as I am in Canada and find, that due to lack of simple mathematical skills, something that should have been smoothly passed has been bungled.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I won't be back until December 1st but I expect you to call my partner Philip Quirk on 0412641479 and explain what you are going to do and I expect to hear from you on Monday 24th.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> Date: 22 November 2014 3:12:54 am GMT-8
>>>>>>>>> To: Philip Quirk <phil at philipquirk.com>, Brook Beves <brookbeves at bigpond.com>, Andrew James EC Marquis <Andrew.James at lifehouserpa.org.au>, Edward Sainsbury Marquis <edsainsbury at ozemail.com.au>, Dave Petschack <dave at oneforall.com.au>, "cquinlan at stratatitle.com.au " <cquinlan at stratatitle.com.au>
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Vote on pet by law at EGM was MISCALCULATED and badly handled. It should have been passed
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: 22 November 2014 3:08:09 am GMT-8
>>>>>>>>>> To: Rob Willett <rob at robadda.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Vote on pet by law at EGM was MISCALCULATED and badly handled. It should have been passed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 22 Nov 2014, at 3:01 am, Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi rob,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am extremely annoyed at the lack of transparency in the vote on the pet by law. There had to be 75% in favour. Eight owners voted. Six voted for and two against. See below. This has seriously harmed my marketing plan. I don't think the result was correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Di
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 22 November 2014 2:57:06 am GMT-8
>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Philip Quirk <phil at philipquirk.com>, Brook Beves <brookbeves at bigpond.com>, Andrew James EC Marquis <Andrew.James at lifehouserpa.org.au>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: date for EGM for Marquis 200 William St 2011
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am sorry to keep asking you about the details of the vote on the pet bylaw where there had to be 75% in favour, but as there were 8 owners voting and two voted against the motion, that would mean that there were four votes against and 13 votes in favour. 13/17 is 76.5%. I had 3 votes and all the others had 2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I can not see how this bylaw was not passed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate a quick answer to this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13 Nov 2014, at 4:25 pm, Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Diana,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> All owners were sent the agenda and had the option to vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The legislation states that when voting on a special resolution, no more than 25% of those voting are to be against the motion in order for it to pass. This didn't happen. It was very close and from memory (I am currently off work) there were 8 unit entitlements in the vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only way for this to be recited on is to have another general meeting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> t: (02) 9266 2600
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stmplus.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For STM’s full disclaimer please visit –http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Important Notice: Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 Nov 2014, at 3:56 am, Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was very disappointed that the pet bylaw did not get passed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would enhance the value of the building. The manner in which the result was calculated was not at all transparent, and then you said it was very close. I would like to know exactly what happened please and how it was calculated. Many owners did not vote and if they were given a heads up the result could well be different. Brook Beves who was in favour of it may have been misunderstood. How many proxies were sent?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Many prospective buyers of my apartment are older people downSizing from a house and many have a pet. While I understand that by law you simply cannot stop anyone from having a companion animal in their home whatever the bylaws may say, naturally no one wants to buy into a building where they are not officially approved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You did say you would get back to me about this, but you haven't and I would really appreciate it if you would do so. Thank you and warm regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana Dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16 Oct 2014, at 11:21 am, Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good Morning Diana,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The agenda has been sent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please see attached scanned copy of the agenda.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image012.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image013.png> <image014.jpg> <image015.png> <image016.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t: (02) 9266 2600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stmplus.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For STM’s full disclaimer please visit – http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Important Notice: Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image011.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Diana Dennison [mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2014 10:51 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: date for EGM for Marquis 200 William St 2011
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you mind forwarding the wording on the pet clause you drafted for another property that will be brought up at our EGM on the 29th? I trust the notices went out yesterday??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana Dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 October 2014 07:37, Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are more than welcome!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t: (02) 9266 2600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stmplus.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For STM’s full disclaimer please visit –http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Important Notice: Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Oct 2014, at 7:31 am, Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great, and thank you very much.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warm regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 October 2014 07:24, Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Diana,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is correct. I understand that it's almost three weeks away, but we require two weeks notice for the meeting and I have other meetings scheduled for the Monday and Tuesday. The agenda will be sent no later than Wednesday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t: (02) 9266 2600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stmplus.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For STM’s full disclaimer please visit –http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Important Notice: Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Oct 2014, at 1:20 am, Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I understand from Rob Willett that the proposed date for the EGM is 29th October. Is that your understanding? Still almost 3 weeks off, but at least it's a date. Will the notice go out soon?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warm regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana Dennisom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8 October 2014 13:16, Diana Dennison <didee.cd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you so much. I will contact Rob Willett and hope for a result.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8 October 2014 12:22, Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Diana,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its not depending on me, I have given them a few dates but I haven’t received a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image007.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image008.png> <image009.jpg> <image010.png> <image011.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t: (02) 9266 2600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stmplus.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For STM’s full disclaimer please visit – http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Important Notice: Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image012.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Diana Dennison [mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 October 2014 12:11 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: date for EGM for Marquis 200 William St 2011
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps I should contact the Chair of the EC to see what the holdup is? Or does it depend on you? I know there will be a week's delay following the setting on the date and that is why I am very frustrated at this lack of action.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warm regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8 October 2014 12:02, Pia Cunningham <pcunningham at stratatitle.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Diana,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, sorry, not date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will follow up again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should you have any queries regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strata Manager and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Company Title Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image013.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image014.png> <image015.jpg> <image016.png> <image017.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t: (02) 9266 2600
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stratatitle.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.stmplus.com.au
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For STM’s full disclaimer please visit – http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Important Notice: Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image012.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Diana Dennison [mailto:didee.cd at gmail.com]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 October 2014 11:47 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Pia Cunningham
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: date for EGM for Marquis 200 William St 2011
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pia,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wondered if a date has been scheduled for the EGM for our building? It is a matter of some urgency to me to get a vote on the proposed bylaw for allowing pets in the building.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diana Dennison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <img-X16101108-0001.pdf>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EC mailing list
>> EC at 200william.com
>> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>
> <67851 EGM Minutes.docx>_______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20141123/cb15a000/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ROB19732_DaveEmailSig.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20664 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20141123/cb15a000/attachment-0001.jpg
More information about the EC
mailing list