[200William-EC SP67851] Building Upgrades Subcommittee

Barney Kitay barnet at kitays.com
Thu May 8 13:36:55 EST 2014


 

Hi All, 

this is the exact reason i asked Maxine 2 years ago that more than 2
weeks notice for the AGM is provided. i very nearly did not open my mail
in time. 

Just because a minimum of 2 weeks notice is required does not mean we
ONLY give 2 weeks notice (incl postage time). it is very easy to send
the notice, minutes and agenda out 4 weeks before, and then follow up
with the SMS we received for the 1st time last week... this will give
everyone time to keep the date open or time to make changes to other
appointments. 

i propose we make this a requirement of our strata managers in the
future. 

---

Kind Regards

_Barney_
m: +61 (0)400 200 446
e: barnet at kitays.com

==================================================

On 07-05-2014 21:07, Rob Willett wrote: 

> Absolutely 100% in favour Matt, 
> 
> I was actually disappointed he never made it last night and is not on the EC for this year. 
> 
> So Go for it as far as I am concerned. 
> 
> On 7 May 2014, at 6:58 pm, Matt Perkins <matt at spectrum.com.au> wrote: 
> 
>> Hi All,
>> Rowan contacted me tonight regarding the AGM apparently he did not 
>> check his mail box and was unaware of the AGM. As a result missed out on 
>> the meeting and elections. As we all know Rowan has been a key driver 
>> heading up the building upgrades subcommittee and has done a lot of hard 
>> work in that area with the comity. He has also been a valued member of 
>> the EC.
>> 
>> As Rowan did not make it to the meeting or nominate he has missed out on 
>> the EC. However I see no reason why he could not play a roll on the 
>> building upgrades subcommittee. It would not give him any voting rights 
>> on the EC. However I believe his contribution in this area is valuable 
>> and it would be a shame to waste all the effort he has put in so far.
>> 
>> If everyone is in favor and if there is no legal impediment I would 
>> like to make this offer to him to be part of the building upgrades group 
>> not a formal member of the EC as such but just an adviser to that 
>> specific group effectively continuing his roll as groups organizer.
>> 
>> What are your thoughts.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> EC mailing list
>> EC at 200william.com
>> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec [1]
 

Links:
------
[1] http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140508/a522dc2e/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ROB19732_RobEmailSig.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140508/a522dc2e/attachment-0001.jpg 


More information about the EC mailing list