[200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by Pack and Send
Matt Perkins
matt at spectrum.com.au
Thu Jun 26 10:31:16 EST 2014
Maxine can you please confirm that the wash bay is owned by the BMC not
the commercial strata.
Matt.
On 26/06/2014 10:09 am, Rob Willett wrote:
> We did not approve 2 swipes. Did not.
>
> They were granted approval by the commercial side ( Andrew Veron ) to
> park 1 car in the wash bay as that is owned by the Commercial side.
> This was only discussed at the last BMC meeting in April. I only
> agreed to it when Andrew advised the Commercial side owned the space,
> so technically I had no choice but to approve as the commercial side
> has every right to determine who parks in their spot. So from my point
> of view, they get 1 swipe.
>
> But we definitely did not approve them to have more than one car and
> certainly not to use the visitors spots which is what they are now
> doing. 1 swipe.
>
> Having said that, Andrew Veron was in agreement that if they abuse the
> privilege by parking in other spots they are not entitled to, he would
> deal with it accordingly. 0 swipes.
>
> My suggestion is Maxine write the note to them warning them not to
> park again in any visitors spots. Warn them that if they do they will
> be barred from parking in the car park completely. And advise them we
> are cancelling the second swipe.
>
> In the meantime I will email Andrew and let him know they are abusing
> the privilege so he is forewarned that we may need to cancel the swipe
> altogether.
>
> I am not sure who approved a second swipe though. They have 1 spot
> they can use. they should have 1 swipe only. If they want another spot
> for their business, let them rent it and pay for it.
>
>
>
>
> *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *
>
>
>
>
> On 25 Jun 2014, at 5:49 pm, Matt Perkins <matt at spectrum.com.au
> <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>> wrote:
>
>> That was never put before the EC by our BMC representative.
>>
>> Maxine when was this approved. It must have been last year as it was
>> not approved by me.
>> Rob can you please advise your reasoning behind granting permission
>> for P&S to use the wash bay as parking.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26/06/2014 9:44 am, Maxine Wickey wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Matt, they have been approved the parking in the washbay by the BMC.
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Maxine Wickey*
>>>
>>> Strata Manager
>>>
>>> /<Mail Attachment.jpeg>/
>>>
>>> //
>>>
>>> <Mail Attachment.png>
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212><Mail
>>> Attachment.jpeg> <https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag><Mail
>>> Attachment.png>
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home><Mail
>>> Attachment.jpeg> <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>
>>>
>>> //
>>>
>>> *t:*(02) 9266 2600
>>>
>>> *www.stratatitle.com.au*
>>>
>>> *www.stmplus.com.au*
>>>
>>> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>>>
>>> For STM's full disclaimer please visit --
>>> http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>
>>> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
>>> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained
>>> on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by
>>> owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective
>>> purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As
>>> such author discretion is advised.
>>>
>>> *From:*Matt Perkins [mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 June 2014 9:42 AM
>>> *To:* Maxine Wickey; ec at 200william.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by Pack
>>> and Send
>>>
>>> I have photos from most days last week of them parking in the wash
>>> bay. I have never ever seen them park in their spot. It's allays a
>>> black FWD.
>>>
>>> Matt.
>>>
>>> On 26/06/2014 9:35 am, Maxine Wickey wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>
>>> I can issue them with an another breach of by-law notice on
>>> behalf of the residential strata plan.
>>>
>>> I did speak with a lady this morning as Danny (the manager) was
>>> in a meeting and they advised that they only moved the vehicle
>>> to the visitors carspace as a tradesperson required access to do
>>> some work. I advised that I understand this may be the case
>>> however they should not have parked in the visitors carspace as
>>> this belongs to the Residential building, they should have
>>> parked outside -- they are not a visitor.
>>>
>>> Cancelling the second swipe would need to be resolved by both
>>> BMC reps.
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Maxine Wickey*
>>>
>>> Strata Manager
>>>
>>> /<Mail Attachment.jpeg>/
>>>
>>> //
>>>
>>> <Mail Attachment.png>
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212><Mail
>>> Attachment.jpeg> <https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag><Mail
>>> Attachment.png>
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home><Mail
>>> Attachment.jpeg> <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>
>>>
>>> //
>>>
>>> *t:*(02) 9266 2600
>>>
>>> *www.stratatitle.com.au <http://www.stratatitle.com.au/>*
>>>
>>> *www.stmplus.com.au <http://www.stmplus.com.au/>*
>>>
>>> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>>>
>>> For STM's full disclaimer please visit --
>>> http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>>>
>>> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all
>>> correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and
>>> emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be
>>> subject to inspection by owners and residents within your
>>> scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may
>>> be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is
>>> advised.
>>>
>>> *From:*Matt Perkins [mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 June 2014 9:18 AM
>>> *To:* ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>; Maxine Wickey
>>> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by
>>> Pack and Send
>>>
>>> I agree we should switch of the card. Here's the thing however.
>>> They are nothing to do with us. They are a commercial tenant. In
>>> the commercial Strata. Im not sure we have any rights to turn of
>>> anything. By all means I think we should give it a go. But when
>>> it comes down to it. They have a parking space on the
>>> commercial strata plan. We cant stop them getting access to it.
>>> The fact that they are parking on our strata plan using the
>>> access via their card is at most just an aid to them trespassing.
>>>
>>> I have no idea how we stop them doing this or even if the
>>> tribunal will even assist us. This may be just a civil matter.
>>>
>>> Maxine would you please advise our options. If turning off there
>>> access is not an option to us or simply gets reversed.
>>>
>>> Matt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26/06/2014 8:34 am, Barney Kitay wrote:
>>>
>>> *I agree we should cancel any parking access over the 1 they
>>> have for a parking bay. *
>>>
>>> *Let them take their best shot to convince a tribunal we are
>>> being unfair...*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Kind regards*
>>>
>>> //
>>>
>>> /Barney/
>>> M +61 (0)400 200 446
>>> E barnet at kitays.com <mailto:barnet at kitays.com>
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *From:*ec-bounces at 200william.com
>>> <mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com>
>>> [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] *On Behalf Of *Rob Willett
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 June 2014 4:51 AM
>>> *To:* ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
>>> ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
>>> *Cc:* Maxine Wickey
>>> *Subject:* [200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by
>>> Pack and Send
>>>
>>> Hi Brook,
>>>
>>> Thanks for making all of us aware of this issue. Clearly
>>> these guys are taking the piss now and you're right, we need
>>> to take action. Same applies to the massage parlour. Time
>>> for action.
>>>
>>> I don't know about you but I paid a lot of money for my spot
>>> when I purchased it and I know what parking space cost is
>>> along the William St area, it's worth a lot. So I cannot see
>>> why a business like theirs can park willy-nilly and expect
>>> not to pay for it. Time for them to take responsibility for
>>> their actions and stop making everyone else pay for them.
>>>
>>> *George,* is it possible to de-activate the fob immediately
>>> for these people. If they have an issue with it, let them
>>> take the action they think they need to, meanwhile I don't
>>> think they should be abusing the parking spots at our expense.
>>>
>>> Let me know if everyone agrees.
>>>
>>> *Maxine,* can you please advise what action we can take.
>>> Let's go down the path of stopping these people and make
>>> them pay. *I would appreciate your urgent advice* so this
>>> issue with Pack n Send does not drag on any longer.
>>>
>>> The same applies to the Massage Parlour. Does anyone know if
>>> they still use the bathrooms as a laundry? I think there was
>>> also an issue of them cooking there at one point. Is that
>>> still the case? I think we also had an issue with the
>>> signage at one point. Cheapens the whole look of the building.
>>>
>>> Time for action, I am happy to be the one who pursues both
>>> of them. No problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks, ROB
>>>
>>> <Mail Attachment.jpeg>
>>>
>>> *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 Jun 2014, at 1:54 am, Brook Beves
>>> <brookbeves at bigpond.com <mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Rob and committee
>>>
>>> Rob your intuition that the commercial tenant (namely Pack
>>> and Send) would abuse the parking spaces if they were given
>>> an additional swipe card is absolutely correct. Their
>>> "promise" that they would only park one car at a time is as
>>> false as they are belligerent.
>>>
>>> Not only did we have months of them parking every day in the
>>> visitors spaces (until we de-activated the additional swipe
>>> card they were holding) they are now resorting to parking
>>> their van every day in the vehicle washing bay area on level
>>> P3. So much for their sincere promise of not abusing the
>>> additional swipe card to access the parking area. Today they
>>> just parked their van in a visitors bay.
>>>
>>> This tenant and its landlord is clearly laughing at us all
>>> full well thinking there is little we can do about it.
>>>
>>> This is clearly a breach of By Laws and immediate action
>>> should be taken informing the tenant in writing to desist
>>> from this practice (with a copy of the notice to the
>>> Landlord). Failing their compliance (which I doubt they
>>> will do) I am quite happy (if authorised by the EC) to take
>>> the matter immediately to the Strata Titles Tribunal to
>>> obtain penalties and costs.
>>>
>>> In the meantime, there is no reason why we cant de-activate
>>> the second swipe card they were recently given, and let them
>>> run to the STT to have it reinstated.
>>>
>>> Brook
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> EC mailing list
>>>
>>> EC at 200william.com <mailto:EC at 200william.com>
>>>
>>> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> /* Matt Perkins
>>>
>>> Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
>>>
>>> Office 1300 133 299matt at spectrum.com.au <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>
>>>
>>> Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
>>>
>>> SIP1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au <mailto:1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au>
>>>
>>> PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found athttp://pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu/>
>>>
>>> */
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> /* Matt Perkins
>>> Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
>>> Office 1300 133 299matt at spectrum.com.au <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>
>>> Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
>>> SIP1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au <mailto:1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au>
>>> PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found athttp://pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu/>
>>> */
>>
>> --
>> /* Matt Perkins
>> Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
>> Office 1300 133 299matt at spectrum.com.au
>> Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
>> SIP1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au
>> PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found athttp://pgp.mit.edu
>> */
>> _______________________________________________
>> EC mailing list
>> EC at 200william.com <mailto:EC at 200william.com>
>> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
--
/* Matt Perkins
Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
Office 1300 133 299 matt at spectrum.com.au
Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
SIP 1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au
PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at http://pgp.mit.edu
*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/459dacd9/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/459dacd9/attachment-0001.jpe
More information about the EC
mailing list