[200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by Pack and Send
Matt Perkins
matt at spectrum.com.au
Thu Jun 26 09:49:42 EST 2014
That was never put before the EC by our BMC representative.
Maxine when was this approved. It must have been last year as it was not
approved by me.
Rob can you please advise your reasoning behind granting permission for
P&S to use the wash bay as parking.
Matt
On 26/06/2014 9:44 am, Maxine Wickey wrote:
>
> Hi Matt, they have been approved the parking in the washbay by the BMC.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> **
>
> *Maxine Wickey*
>
> Strata Manager
>
> /STM RGB.jpg/
>
> //
>
> facebook_logo[1].png
> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>twitter-bird-blue-on-white.png
> <https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag>LinkedIn-Logo.png
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home>STM
> Stratasphere_ICON.jpg <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>
>
> //
>
> *t:*(02) 9266 2600
>
> *www.stratatitle.com.au*
>
> *www.stmplus.com.au*
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> For STM's full disclaimer please visit --
> http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on
> the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for
> any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author
> discretion is advised.
>
> *From:*Matt Perkins [mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 June 2014 9:42 AM
> *To:* Maxine Wickey; ec at 200william.com
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by Pack
> and Send
>
> I have photos from most days last week of them parking in the wash
> bay. I have never ever seen them park in their spot. It's allays a
> black FWD.
>
> Matt.
>
> On 26/06/2014 9:35 am, Maxine Wickey wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> I can issue them with an another breach of by-law notice on behalf
> of the residential strata plan.
>
> I did speak with a lady this morning as Danny (the manager) was in
> a meeting and they advised that they only moved the vehicle to the
> visitors carspace as a tradesperson required access to do some
> work. I advised that I understand this may be the case however
> they should not have parked in the visitors carspace as this
> belongs to the Residential building, they should have parked
> outside -- they are not a visitor.
>
> Cancelling the second swipe would need to be resolved by both BMC
> reps.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> **
>
> *Maxine Wickey*
>
> Strata Manager
>
> /STM RGB.jpg/
>
> //
>
> facebook_logo[1].png
> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>twitter-bird-blue-on-white.png
> <https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag>LinkedIn-Logo.png
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home>STM
> Stratasphere_ICON.jpg <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>
>
> //
>
> *t:*(02) 9266 2600
>
> *www.stratatitle.com.au <http://www.stratatitle.com.au>*
>
> *www.stmplus.com.au <http://www.stmplus.com.au>*
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> For STM's full disclaimer please visit --
> http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all
> correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and
> emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject
> to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well
> as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within
> your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>
> *From:*Matt Perkins [mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 June 2014 9:18 AM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>; Maxine Wickey
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by
> Pack and Send
>
> I agree we should switch of the card. Here's the thing however.
> They are nothing to do with us. They are a commercial tenant. In
> the commercial Strata. Im not sure we have any rights to turn of
> anything. By all means I think we should give it a go. But when it
> comes down to it. They have a parking space on the commercial
> strata plan. We cant stop them getting access to it. The fact
> that they are parking on our strata plan using the access via
> their card is at most just an aid to them trespassing.
>
> I have no idea how we stop them doing this or even if the tribunal
> will even assist us. This may be just a civil matter.
>
> Maxine would you please advise our options. If turning off there
> access is not an option to us or simply gets reversed.
>
> Matt.
>
>
>
> On 26/06/2014 8:34 am, Barney Kitay wrote:
>
> *I agree we should cancel any parking access over the 1 they
> have for a parking bay. *
>
> *Let them take their best shot to convince a tribunal we are
> being unfair...*
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> *Kind regards*
>
> //
>
> /Barney/
> M +61 (0)400 200 446
> E barnet at kitays.com <mailto:barnet at kitays.com>
>
> **
>
> *From:*ec-bounces at 200william.com
> <mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com>
> [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] *On Behalf Of *Rob Willett
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 June 2014 4:51 AM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
> ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
> *Cc:* Maxine Wickey
> *Subject:* [200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by
> Pack and Send
>
> Hi Brook,
>
> Thanks for making all of us aware of this issue. Clearly these
> guys are taking the piss now and you're right, we need to take
> action. Same applies to the massage parlour. Time for action.
>
> I don't know about you but I paid a lot of money for my spot
> when I purchased it and I know what parking space cost is
> along the William St area, it's worth a lot. So I cannot see
> why a business like theirs can park willy-nilly and expect not
> to pay for it. Time for them to take responsibility for their
> actions and stop making everyone else pay for them.
>
> *George,* is it possible to de-activate the fob immediately
> for these people. If they have an issue with it, let them take
> the action they think they need to, meanwhile I don't think
> they should be abusing the parking spots at our expense.
>
> Let me know if everyone agrees.
>
> *Maxine,* can you please advise what action we can take. Let's
> go down the path of stopping these people and make them pay.
> *I would appreciate your urgent advice* so this issue with
> Pack n Send does not drag on any longer.
>
> The same applies to the Massage Parlour. Does anyone know if
> they still use the bathrooms as a laundry? I think there was
> also an issue of them cooking there at one point. Is that
> still the case? I think we also had an issue with the signage
> at one point. Cheapens the whole look of the building.
>
> Time for action, I am happy to be the one who pursues both of
> them. No problem.
>
> Thanks, ROB
>
> *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25 Jun 2014, at 1:54 am, Brook Beves
> <brookbeves at bigpond.com <mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Rob and committee
>
> Rob your intuition that the commercial tenant (namely Pack and
> Send) would abuse the parking spaces if they were given an
> additional swipe card is absolutely correct. Their "promise"
> that they would only park one car at a time is as false as
> they are belligerent.
>
> Not only did we have months of them parking every day in the
> visitors spaces (until we de-activated the additional swipe
> card they were holding) they are now resorting to parking
> their van every day in the vehicle washing bay area on level
> P3. So much for their sincere promise of not abusing the
> additional swipe card to access the parking area. Today they
> just parked their van in a visitors bay.
>
> This tenant and its landlord is clearly laughing at us all
> full well thinking there is little we can do about it.
>
> This is clearly a breach of By Laws and immediate action
> should be taken informing the tenant in writing to desist from
> this practice (with a copy of the notice to the Landlord).
> Failing their compliance (which I doubt they will do) I am
> quite happy (if authorised by the EC) to take the matter
> immediately to the Strata Titles Tribunal to obtain penalties
> and costs.
>
> In the meantime, there is no reason why we cant de-activate
> the second swipe card they were recently given, and let them
> run to the STT to have it reinstated.
>
> Brook
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> EC mailing list
>
> EC at 200william.com <mailto:EC at 200william.com>
>
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> /* Matt Perkins
>
> Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
>
> Office 1300 133 299matt at spectrum.com.au <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>
>
> Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
>
> SIP1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au <mailto:1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au>
>
> PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found athttp://pgp.mit.edu
>
> */
>
>
>
> --
> /* Matt Perkins
> Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
> Office 1300 133 299matt at spectrum.com.au <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>
> Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
> SIP1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au <mailto:1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au>
> PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found athttp://pgp.mit.edu
> */
--
/* Matt Perkins
Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
Office 1300 133 299 matt at spectrum.com.au
Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
SIP 1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au
PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at http://pgp.mit.edu
*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3787 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0007.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1986 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0004.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 966 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0008.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 2898 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0005.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1055 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0009.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3789 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0010.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1986 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0006.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 966 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0011.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 2898 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0007.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1055 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0012.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/67701105/attachment-0013.jpe
More information about the EC
mailing list