[200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by Pack and Send
Matt Perkins
matt at spectrum.com.au
Thu Jun 26 09:42:22 EST 2014
I have photos from most days last week of them parking in the wash bay.
I have never ever seen them park in their spot. It's allays a black FWD.
Matt.
On 26/06/2014 9:35 am, Maxine Wickey wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> I can issue them with an another breach of by-law notice on behalf of
> the residential strata plan.
>
> I did speak with a lady this morning as Danny (the manager) was in a
> meeting and they advised that they only moved the vehicle to the
> visitors carspace as a tradesperson required access to do some work.
> I advised that I understand this may be the case however they should
> not have parked in the visitors carspace as this belongs to the
> Residential building, they should have parked outside -- they are not
> a visitor.
>
> Cancelling the second swipe would need to be resolved by both BMC reps.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> **
>
> *Maxine Wickey*
>
> Strata Manager
>
> /STM RGB.jpg/
>
> //
>
> facebook_logo[1].png
> <http://www.facebook.com/browse/admined_pages/?id=100004719999379#%21/pages/Strata-Title-Management-Group-STM/120176711475212>twitter-bird-blue-on-white.png
> <https://twitter.com/STM_StrataManag>LinkedIn-Logo.png
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/strata-title-management-stm-?trk=top_nav_home>STM
> Stratasphere_ICON.jpg <https://twitter.com/STMStratasphere>
>
> //
>
> *t:*(02) 9266 2600
>
> *www.stratatitle.com.au*
>
> *www.stmplus.com.au*
>
> *Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer*
>
> For STM's full disclaimer please visit --
> http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>
> *Important Notice: *Owners should be aware that all correspondence,
> including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on
> the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and
> residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for
> any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author
> discretion is advised.
>
> *From:*Matt Perkins [mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 June 2014 9:18 AM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com; Maxine Wickey
> *Subject:* Re: [200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by Pack
> and Send
>
> I agree we should switch of the card. Here's the thing however. They
> are nothing to do with us. They are a commercial tenant. In the
> commercial Strata. Im not sure we have any rights to turn of anything.
> By all means I think we should give it a go. But when it comes down to
> it. They have a parking space on the commercial strata plan. We cant
> stop them getting access to it. The fact that they are parking on our
> strata plan using the access via their card is at most just an aid to
> them trespassing.
>
> I have no idea how we stop them doing this or even if the tribunal
> will even assist us. This may be just a civil matter.
>
> Maxine would you please advise our options. If turning off there
> access is not an option to us or simply gets reversed.
>
> Matt.
>
>
> On 26/06/2014 8:34 am, Barney Kitay wrote:
>
> *I agree we should cancel any parking access over the 1 they have
> for a parking bay. *
>
> *Let them take their best shot to convince a tribunal we are being
> unfair...*
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> *Kind regards*
>
> //
>
> /Barney/
> M +61 (0)400 200 446
> E barnet at kitays.com <mailto:barnet at kitays.com>
>
> **
>
> *From:*ec-bounces at 200william.com
> <mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com>
> [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] *On Behalf Of *Rob Willett
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 June 2014 4:51 AM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
> ec at 200william.com <mailto:ec at 200william.com>
> *Cc:* Maxine Wickey
> *Subject:* [200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by Pack
> and Send
>
> Hi Brook,
>
> Thanks for making all of us aware of this issue. Clearly these
> guys are taking the piss now and you're right, we need to take
> action. Same applies to the massage parlour. Time for action.
>
> I don't know about you but I paid a lot of money for my spot when
> I purchased it and I know what parking space cost is along the
> William St area, it's worth a lot. So I cannot see why a business
> like theirs can park willy-nilly and expect not to pay for it.
> Time for them to take responsibility for their actions and stop
> making everyone else pay for them.
>
> *George,* is it possible to de-activate the fob immediately for
> these people. If they have an issue with it, let them take the
> action they think they need to, meanwhile I don't think they
> should be abusing the parking spots at our expense.
>
> Let me know if everyone agrees.
>
> *Maxine,* can you please advise what action we can take. Let's go
> down the path of stopping these people and make them pay. *I would
> appreciate your urgent advice* so this issue with Pack n Send does
> not drag on any longer.
>
> The same applies to the Massage Parlour. Does anyone know if they
> still use the bathrooms as a laundry? I think there was also an
> issue of them cooking there at one point. Is that still the case?
> I think we also had an issue with the signage at one point.
> Cheapens the whole look of the building.
>
> Time for action, I am happy to be the one who pursues both of
> them. No problem.
>
> Thanks, ROB
>
> *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *
>
>
>
>
> On 25 Jun 2014, at 1:54 am, Brook Beves <brookbeves at bigpond.com
> <mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Dear Rob and committee
>
> Rob your intuition that the commercial tenant (namely Pack and
> Send) would abuse the parking spaces if they were given an
> additional swipe card is absolutely correct. Their "promise" that
> they would only park one car at a time is as false as they are
> belligerent.
>
> Not only did we have months of them parking every day in the
> visitors spaces (until we de-activated the additional swipe card
> they were holding) they are now resorting to parking their van
> every day in the vehicle washing bay area on level P3. So much
> for their sincere promise of not abusing the additional swipe card
> to access the parking area. Today they just parked their van in a
> visitors bay.
>
> This tenant and its landlord is clearly laughing at us all full
> well thinking there is little we can do about it.
>
> This is clearly a breach of By Laws and immediate action should be
> taken informing the tenant in writing to desist from this practice
> (with a copy of the notice to the Landlord). Failing their
> compliance (which I doubt they will do) I am quite happy (if
> authorised by the EC) to take the matter immediately to the
> Strata Titles Tribunal to obtain penalties and costs.
>
> In the meantime, there is no reason why we cant de-activate the
> second swipe card they were recently given, and let them run to
> the STT to have it reinstated.
>
> Brook
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> EC mailing list
>
> EC at 200william.com <mailto:EC at 200william.com>
>
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
>
>
>
> --
> /* Matt Perkins
> Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
> Office 1300 133 299matt at spectrum.com.au <mailto:matt at spectrum.com.au>
> Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
> SIP1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au <mailto:1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au>
> PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found athttp://pgp.mit.edu
> */
--
/* Matt Perkins
Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
Office 1300 133 299 matt at spectrum.com.au
Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
SIP 1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au
PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at http://pgp.mit.edu
*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/c4e8db4f/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3789 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/c4e8db4f/attachment-0004.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1986 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/c4e8db4f/attachment-0002.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 966 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/c4e8db4f/attachment-0005.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 2898 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/c4e8db4f/attachment-0003.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1055 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/c4e8db4f/attachment-0006.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/c4e8db4f/attachment-0007.jpe
More information about the EC
mailing list