[200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by Pack and Send

Thu Jun 26 09:17:34 EST 2014

I agree we should switch of the card. Here's the thing however. They are 
nothing to do with us. They are a commercial tenant. In the commercial 
Strata. Im not sure we have any rights to turn of anything. By all means 
I think we should give it a go. But when it comes down to it.  They have 
a parking space on the commercial strata plan. We cant stop them getting 
access to it.  The fact that they are parking on our strata plan using 
the access via their card is at most just an aid to them trespassing.

I have no idea how we stop them doing this or even if the tribunal will 
even assist us. This may be just a civil matter.

Maxine would you please advise our options. If turning off there access 
is not an option to us or simply gets reversed.

Matt.

On 26/06/2014 8:34 am, Barney Kitay wrote:
>
> *I agree we should cancel any parking access over the 1 they have for 
> a parking bay. *
>
> *Let them take their best shot to convince a tribunal we are being 
> unfair...*
>
> **
>
> **
>
> **
>
> *Kind regards*
>
> //
>
> /Barney/
> M  +61 (0)400 200 446
> E barnet at kitays.com <mailto:barnet at kitays.com>
>
> **
>
> *From:*ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] 
> *On Behalf Of *Rob Willett
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 June 2014 4:51 AM
> *To:* ec at 200william.com ec at 200william.com
> *Cc:* Maxine Wickey
> *Subject:* [200William-EC SP67851] Violation of parking by Pack and Send
>
> Hi Brook,
>
> Thanks for making all of us aware of this issue. Clearly these guys 
> are taking the piss now and you're right, we need to take action. Same 
> applies to the massage parlour. Time for action.
>
> I don't know about you but I paid a lot of money for my spot when I 
> purchased it and I know what parking space cost is along the William 
> St area, it's worth a lot. So I cannot see why a business like theirs 
> can park willy-nilly and expect not to pay for it. Time for them to 
> take responsibility for their actions and stop making everyone else 
> pay for them.
>
> *George,* is it possible to de-activate the fob immediately for these 
> people. If they have an issue with it, let them take the action they 
> think they need to, meanwhile I don't think they should be abusing the 
> parking spots at our expense.
>
> Let me know if everyone agrees.
>
> *Maxine,* can you please advise what action we can take. Let's go down 
> the path of stopping these people and make them pay. *I would 
> appreciate your urgent advice* so this issue with Pack n Send does not 
> drag on any longer.
>
> The same applies to the Massage Parlour. Does anyone know if they 
> still use the bathrooms as a laundry? I think there was also an issue 
> of them cooking there at one point. Is that still the case? I think we 
> also had an issue with the signage at one point. Cheapens the whole 
> look of the building.
>
> Time for action, I am happy to be the one who pursues both of them. No 
> problem.
>
> Thanks, ROB
>
> *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *
>
>
>
> On 25 Jun 2014, at 1:54 am, Brook Beves <brookbeves at bigpond.com 
> <mailto:brookbeves at bigpond.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear Rob and committee
>
> Rob your intuition that the commercial tenant (namely Pack and Send) 
> would abuse the parking spaces if they were given an additional swipe 
> card is absolutely correct. Their "promise" that they would only park 
> one car at a time is as false as they are belligerent.
>
> Not only did we have months of them parking every day in the visitors 
> spaces (until we de-activated the additional swipe card they were 
> holding) they are now resorting to parking their van every day in the 
> vehicle washing bay area on level P3.  So much for their sincere 
> promise of not abusing the additional swipe card to access the parking 
> area. Today they just parked their van in a visitors bay.
>
> This tenant and its landlord is clearly laughing at us all full well 
> thinking there is little we can do about it.
>
> This is clearly a breach of By Laws and immediate action should be 
> taken informing the tenant in writing to desist from this practice 
> (with a copy of the notice to the Landlord).  Failing their compliance 
> (which I doubt they will do) I am quite happy (if authorised by the 
> EC) to take the matter immediately  to the Strata Titles Tribunal to 
> obtain penalties and costs.
>
> In the meantime, there is no reason why we cant de-activate the second 
> swipe card they were recently given, and let them run to the STT to 
> have it reinstated.
>
> Brook
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec

-- 
/* Matt Perkins
         Direct 1300 137 379     Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
         Office 1300 133 299     matt at spectrum.com.au
                                 Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
         SIP 1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au
         PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at  http://pgp.mit.edu
*/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/1d2651ac/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20140626/1d2651ac/attachment-0001.jpe 