[200William-EC] Beach Notice to 502

Rob Willett rob at robadda.com
Tue Dec 3 14:33:18 EST 2013


Hi there, 


Can I reiterate, we are not preventing access, we are just making people accountable for the use of the spots.

Maxine, please copy the EC members with the breach notice and the email ( bcc )

Thanks 




IN SRI LANKA / CELL PHONE +94 766 88 92 98
5.5 HOURS BEHIND SYDNEY / 10.5 HOURS AHEAD NEW YORK



On 03/12/2013, at 3:31 AM, Maxine Wickey <mwickey at stratatitle.com.au> wrote:

> Dear Committee,
>  
> We have been waiting for the managing agent to get back to us with the tenants details.  I have called them yet again this morning and have finally been advised who the tenants are.  We will be issuing the breach notice today.
>  
> Brook you can’t tow vehicles you will be charged with theft.
>  
> Regarding the visitors carspaces again this is something that needs to be checked from council before we preventing access to them.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Maxine Wickey
> Strata Manager
>  
> <image002.jpg>
>  
> <image003.png>   <image004.jpg>   <image005.png>   <image006.jpg>    
>  
> t:   (02) 9540 4199
> www.stratatitle.com.au
> www.stmplus.com.au
>  
> Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
> For STM’s full disclaimer please visit – http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp
>  
> Important Notice:  Owners should be aware that all correspondence, including letters, facsimile transmissions and emails are retained on the file of your scheme and may be subject to inspection by owners and residents within your scheme, as well as prospective purchasers for any lot that may be for sale within your scheme. As such author discretion is advised.
>  
> From: ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On Behalf Of Brook Beves
> Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2013 8:48 AM
> To: 'Rob Willett'; ec at 200william.com
> Subject: Re: [200William-EC] Quotation: 200 William Street, Woolloomooloo - Parking Locks
>  
> I am a definite YES at option B cost.
>  
> FYI as at 7.15 am this morning, the same black Peugeot remains in the same Visitors parking bay and has not been moved in weeks and despite the issue of Breach Notices, letters and  notes under their windscreen (including attempting to buzz their unit which they don’t answer), the offenders just laugh at our attempts to have the vehicle removed.  Perhaps George could arrange a tow truck to have it removed out onto the street?
>  
> Brook
>  
> From: ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On Behalf Of Rob Willett
> Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013 11:08 PM
> To: ec at 200william.com ec at 200william.com
> Subject: [200William-EC] Quotation: 200 William Street, Woolloomooloo - Parking Locks
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> Just reiterating, no one is closing off visitors spots, we are just securing them to make visitors, guests, tradespeople accountable following numerous complaints, especially from the EC, over the past months and indeed, years. As discussed. So it can either be done, or not. It's not personal. I don't really care. 
>  
> The other reason for wanting to secure them is to stop transients from entering the car park ( has been a major complaint over the past 3 years, especially from EC members )  ) and to stop tenants sub-letting their spots and using the visitors spots. 
>  
> But the major reason is to fund the cctv system. We don't have a budget for it and if we want to do it, we should raise the revenue from the buildings available resources. 
>  
> Please folks: Forget any nasty and personal comments against me please. I don't need it or want it. Simply give us a Yes or a No. If you vote yes, the preferred option. A B C. If you vote no, great. But don't take your misguided anger out on me. 
>  
> Majority will decide. Thanks for the feedback to date folks, but keep it positive.
>  
> So far we Have:
>  
>  
> Matt                            TBA
> Rowan             TBA
> Rob                             Yes
> Di                                No
> Brook              TBA
> Andrew                       TBA
> Craig               No
> Dave                TBA
> Barnay             TBA
>  
>  
> <image007.jpg>
> 
> IN SRI LANKA / CELL PHONE +94 766 88 92 98
> 5.5 HOURS BEHIND SYDNEY / 10.5 HOURS AHEAD NEW YORK
>  
>  
>  
> On 02/12/2013, at 5:33 PM, CSCL <cscl at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>  
> 
> Ridiculous to close off the visitor spots.  They are for visitors!!
>  
> We don’t have an onsite manager.  Who would monitor the yellow triangles?  Rob – are you available to pop down each time?
>  
> My vote is a definite NO.
>  
> Cages – a good idea for revenue.
>  
> Regards,
> Craig Laforest
>  
> From: ec-bounces at 200william.com [mailto:ec-bounces at 200william.com] On Behalf Of Diana Dennison
> Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013 9:22 PM
> To: Rob Willett; ec at 200william.com; Matt Perkins
> Subject: Re: [200William-EC] Quotation: 200 William Street, Woolloomooloo - Parking Locks
>  
> Hi Rob,
>  
> Before we think of installing these things, have we considered the cost of administering 'charged visitor's parking'? And who would do it? Is it remotely worth it? Some visitors come for an hour, some come for the night. What's the plan? 
>  
> I am sorry I can't keep it to a NO. 
>  
> Rob, I am a NO until the above issues have been resolved; you don't just bung in yellow triangles without a plan. We're surely not planning to rent a space on an overnight basis? We'll end up with locked empty spaces during the day waiting for the booked car to arrive and nowhere for the one-hour visitor to park. Madness. My last 2 visitors managed to park.
>  
> Please outline a sensible plan of action before going further. The cages are another matter and good to go.
>  
> Why has no one asked the owner of the Peugeot to move it? I've just gone downstairs and rung #502's bell but although someone answered, I couldn't hear them or they couldn't hear em, so I'll leave a note asking Junior to give me a ring and I'll ask him to get the car moved. 
>  
> best to all,
>  
> Di
>  
> 
> On 2 December 2013 19:26, Rob Willett <rob at robadda.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>  
> Following Friday's discussion re the Visitor parking, I have obtained a quotation for 3 variations. Can you all please review and let me know 
>  
> 1) You confirm that we go ahead with the installation
>  
> 2) If you approve of the cost for A) $1140 B) $ 1760 of C) $2420
>  
> Can we please keep the responses short and sharp. 
>  
> FYI, I am a YES and B) $1760
>  
>  
> Thanks Brook for being there to allow access for the tradesmen on Friday, much appreciated. If we can get your responses quickly we can get this underway and start work almost immediately. 
>  
> We can then start deciding the spare cages and how to lease them and the amount we can charge. With the revenue streams for the cages and the Visitor car spots will fund the security system and have no need to increase levies. 
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> IN SRI LANKA / CELL PHONE +94 766 88 92 98
> 5.5 HOURS BEHIND SYDNEY / 10.5 HOURS AHEAD NEW YORK
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EC mailing list
> EC at 200william.com
> http://200william.com/mailman/listinfo/ec
> 
>  
>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20131203/9c8c7547/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ROB19732_RobEmailSig.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20131203/9c8c7547/attachment-0001.jpg 


More information about the EC mailing list