[200William-EC] Strata Plan 67851 - "Marquis" - Budget/accounts for y/e 28/2/13

Maxine Wickey mwickey at stratatitle.com.au
Thu Jun 7 13:44:16 EST 2012


Dear Craig,


1.       The handout you are referring to may be the proposed budget I gave to Rob as a member of the BMC.  The BMC pays the building manager however the Strata Plan had been paying the Building Manager fees last year.

2.       The reason there is a zero balance for BFMS fees is because the BMC will be paying the fee.

3.       The levy contribution is what the Owners Corporation pays the BMC for shared expenses.

All of these items were addressed at the AGM.

Regards,

Maxine Wickey
Strata Manager
[cid:image001.jpg at 01CD44B3.A1D8D7F0]
t:   (02) 9540 4199
www.stratatitle.com.au<http://www.stratatitle.com.au/>
www.stmplus.com.au<http://www.stmplus.com.au/>

Emailed Communication / Documents Disclaimer
For STM's full disclaimer please visit - http://www.stratatitle.com.au/privacy.asp

Please only print if necessary.

From: Craig Laforest [mailto:cscl at optusnet.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2012 4:07 PM
To: Maxine Wickey
Subject: Strata Plan 67851 - "Marquis" - Budget/accounts for y/e 28/2/13

Dear Ms Wickey,

Further to our recent AGM meeting, would you kindly explain the following:


1)      In a separate handout at the recent AGM, the proposed budget figure for"Staff Contract Building Manager" was $41,000 for the y/e 28/2/13. Is this the only line item (182600) that relates to the fee for George Ziri's services?

Would you kindly advise also why there is an increase of $7,234.69 (actual y/e 29/2/12) vs the budgeted amount of $41,000 - an increase of approximately 21%.  Did George propose this increase?  Was this $41,000 a correct amount? If not, why was it shown?


2)      In another handout (a bound booklet) for the AGM, it shows a zero balance for the budget for George Ziri's contract fee for the y/e 28/2/2013.  What is the correct amount?


3)      In the same bound booklet for the AGM, it shows an amount of $171,938.00 as "Admin - Levy Contribution" under the heading "less expenses."



I am trying to understand this line item - who or what company is this paid out to?

Finally, would you please email me, as soon as possible, a completed copy of the final budget for SP67851 for the y/e 28/2/13, against "actual" for the y/e 29/2/12 and the "previous budget" for the y/e 28/2/11.  This would be greatly appreciated.


I look forward to hearing from you.

Thank you and regards,
Craig Laforest
Apt 601





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20120607/9bf66322/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4809 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://200william.com/mailman/private/ec/attachments/20120607/9bf66322/attachment-0001.jpg 


More information about the EC mailing list